当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

论司法的宽容及其限度

发布时间:2018-03-02 12:54

  本文选题:司法 切入点:宽容 出处:《中共中央党校》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:在当代社会,宽容不仅是个体的美德,更是成为国家机构配置和运作权力的必要策略,也对司法活动产生深刻影响。本论文主要采取规范研究法和定性研究法,分为三部分分别探讨司法宽容的概念、理论根据和适用限度。第一部分,通过用语习惯抽象出宽容的必要要素和排除出宽容的反对要素,界定了宽容和司法宽容的概念,并考察了宽容与怯弱、冷漠,司法宽容与司法宽恕、纵容、宽严相济的关系,列举了司法宽容的实践案例。第二部分,从理论上探讨司法宽容的正当性根据。其哲学依据是价值相对主义和适度禁欲主义。司法宽容并非背离司法的正义使命,而是立法宽容的延伸和司法与民意互动的结果。正义包括了人们的功利性要求,有限度的宽容还具有功利价值。第三部分,以保卫宽容、谨遵法律和民众监督三项原则尝试为司法宽容的适用设置限度。在社会生活节奏日益加快和国际法律文化交流日益深刻的大背景下,本文旨在以司法的宽容为切入点,揭示司法机关积极而适当地扮演社会改革和保护话语弱势群体角色的趋势。
[Abstract]:In contemporary society, tolerance is not only an individual virtue, but also a necessary strategy for the allocation and operation of state institutions, and also has a profound impact on judicial activities. It is divided into three parts to discuss the concept, theoretical basis and applicable limit of judicial tolerance. The first part abstracts the necessary elements of tolerance and excludes the opposing elements of tolerance through idioms, and defines the concepts of tolerance and judicial tolerance. It also examines the relationship between tolerance and weakness, indifference, judicial tolerance and judicial forgiveness, connivance and leniency, and enumerates practical cases of judicial tolerance. This paper discusses the justification of judicial tolerance theoretically. Its philosophical basis is value relativism and moderate asceticism. Judicial tolerance does not deviate from the just mission of judicature. It is the result of the extension of legislative tolerance and the interaction between justice and public opinion. Justice includes people's utilitarian demands, and limited tolerance also has utilitarian value. Following the three principles of law and public supervision, this paper attempts to set limits for the application of judicial tolerance. Under the background of the accelerating pace of social life and the increasingly profound international legal and cultural exchanges, this paper aims at taking judicial tolerance as the starting point. It reveals the tendency of the judiciary to play the role of social reform and protection of discourse vulnerable groups actively and appropriately.
【学位授予单位】:中共中央党校
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D916

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 廖明;;论刑事和解的客体[J];比较法研究;2010年05期

2 刘东根;恢复性司法及其对我国刑事司法实践的借鉴[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期

3 刘仁文;;宽严相济的刑事政策研究[J];当代法学;2008年01期

4 约安娜·库茨拉底;论宽容和宽容的限度[J];第欧根尼;1998年02期

5 莫妮克·坎托-斯佩伯,钟良明;我们能宽容到什么程度[J];第欧根尼;1999年01期

6 保罗·利科,费杰;宽容的销蚀和不宽容的抵制[J];第欧根尼;1999年01期

7 陈兴良;;宽严相济刑事政策研究[J];法学杂志;2006年01期

8 刘敏;论司法公开的扩张与限制[J];法学评论;2001年05期

9 郭道晖;;认真对待权力[J];法学;2011年01期

10 卫华;新自由主义及其批判[J];国外理论动态;1999年12期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 张善q,

本文编号:1556609


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1556609.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户49bfb***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com