检察机关不批捕案件复核工作研究

发布时间：2018-03-02 14:01

本文选题：不批准逮捕　切入点：复核　出处：《国家检察官学院学报》2013年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：近年来,分、州、市级检察机关受理不批捕复核案件数量激增,处理难度加大,但不批捕后改变原不批捕决定的比例极低。造成不批捕复核案件数量激增的原因主要有不批捕案件数量攀升、复核程序启动随意、复议程序走过场、不批捕决定说理性不强等原因。为缓解不批捕复核案件激增与侦监部门办案资源紧张的矛盾,避免启动不必要的复核和防止复核走过场,在制度层面应进一步细化审查逮捕条件、严格复核程序的启动条件、废除不批捕案件复议程序、扩大当事人的程序参与权;在操作层面应建立复核案件办理的沟通与磋商机制、完善复核案件的风险评估机制、建立复核案件的案后追踪机制、制定复核案件说理规范、完善复核工作的考核机制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the number of cases received by procuratorial organs at the state, state, and municipal levels without approval for review has increased dramatically, making it more difficult to handle. However, the proportion of people who change their original decision of not approving arrest after not approving arrest is extremely low. The main reasons for the surge in the number of non-approved arrest cases are the increase in the number of non-approved arrest cases, the arbitrary start of the review procedure, and the formality of the reconsideration procedure. In order to alleviate the contradiction between the proliferation of non-approved arrest cases and the tight resources of investigation and supervision departments in handling cases, to avoid initiating unnecessary reviews and preventing the conduct of reviews, At the system level, we should further refine the examination and arrest conditions, strictly review the starting conditions of the procedure, abolish the procedure of non-approval case review, expand the party's right to participate in the procedure, and establish a mechanism of communication and consultation for the handling of the review case at the operational level. We should perfect the risk assessment mechanism of the review case, establish the post-case tracking mechanism of the review case, formulate the reasoning standard of the case review, and perfect the examination mechanism of the review work.
【作者单位】：天津市人民检察院第一分院;
【分类号】：D926.3;D925.2

【相似文献】