涉诉信访问题的法社会学解读
发布时间:2018-03-04 03:07
本文选题:涉诉信访 切入点:案例研究 出处:《西北师范大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:信访是指公民、法人或者其他组织通过走访、书信、电话等形式,向各级人民政府及其工作部门反映情况、提出诉求或者建议,有关行政机关依法处理的活动。在我国的社会生活中,它是人们来信和来访的简称,承担着权利补救和权力监督的功能,具有相当浓郁的中国特色。 涉诉信访是指案件进入司法程序或司法程序已经终结的涉及司法机关的信访的总称,即经过人民法院立案受理、开庭审理或强制执行的案件当事人或案件以外的第三人,通过各级国家机关或人民法院信访渠道,采取向有关部门告诉、申诉的方法,要求维持、撤销、变更人民法院裁判结果和督促履行或制止履行执行内容的来信来访行为。随着我国改革开放的深入发展,利益关系与格局遭到空前调整,社会中一些更深层次的矛盾逐渐显现出来,因此,涉诉信访被越来越多的人们所利用。尤其在司法领域,人们宁愿选择不断上访,也不愿坚持法律程序最终解决矛盾和纠纷,司法成了最大的恶,人们不再信任我国的法律,,涉诉信访活动始终处在一个相对活跃的时期。涉诉信访过程中的种种问题日益突出,一直无法彻底有效地解决,困扰着司法系统。理顺涉诉信访的处理渠道,树立司法权威,维护司法裁判的终局性,使其判决获得当事人的真正服从,涉诉信访问题的解决才有望最终实现。 第一部分就是涉诉信访问题的案例研究,包括涉诉信访理论综述—明确涉诉信访的概念、特征和性质,厘清涉诉信访与其它相关概念的关系,讨论涉诉信访的法律基础;透过16起民事案例来看当前的涉诉信访情况;16起民事案例反映出来的涉诉信访问题。第二部分就是涉诉信访问题的法社会学分析,包括涉诉信访问题的客观评述;涉诉信访问题产生的原因分析—从我国的客观环境、人民法院、信访者以及司法制度四个方面讨论导致涉诉信访问题的原因分析。第三部分就是解决涉诉信访问题的思路与对策,包括解决涉诉信访问题的原则和解决涉诉信访问题的对策。第四部分就是结论,针对目前的涉诉信访问题得出基本的结论。
[Abstract]:"letter and visit" means that citizens, legal persons or other organizations, through visits, letters, telephone calls, etc., report the situation to the people's governments at all levels and their work departments, and make demands or suggestions, In the social life of our country, it is the abbreviation of people's letters and visits, which bears the functions of right remedy and power supervision, and has quite rich Chinese characteristics. Litigant petition refers to the general name of a petition involving a judicial organ that has ended in the judicial proceedings or judicial proceedings, that is, a party to a case or a third person other than a case whose case has been filed for acceptance, heard or enforced by the people's court, Through the channels of letters and visits of state organs or people's courts at all levels, adopting the method of informing and appealing to the relevant departments, asking for maintenance and revocation, With the in-depth development of China's reform and opening up, the relationship and pattern of interests have been adjusted unprecedentedly. Some deeper contradictions in society have gradually emerged, so more and more people are making use of complaints and petitions. Especially in the judicial field, people prefer to keep petitioning, rather than insisting on legal procedures for the final resolution of conflicts and disputes. Judicature has become the biggest evil, people no longer trust the law of our country, the activity of petition and petition is always in a relatively active period. The problems in the process of petition and petition are becoming more and more prominent and can not be solved completely and effectively. Perplexing the judicial system, straightening out the processing channels of petition, establishing judicial authority, maintaining the finality of judicial decision, and making its judgment obtain the true service of the parties, the solution of the problem of petition and petition is expected to be finally realized. The first part is a case study on the issue of petition, including a review of the theory of petition and petition-to clarify the concept, characteristics and nature of the petition, to clarify the relationship between the petition and other related concepts, and to discuss the legal basis of the petition; According to 16 civil cases, the current situation of complaint letters and visits is reviewed. The second part is the sociological analysis of complaint letters and visits, including the objective comments on the issues of complaint letters and visits. Analysis of the causes of the problems arising from the complaint Letters and visits-from the objective environment of our country, the people's courts, The third part is the thinking and countermeasures to solve the problem of complaint petition. The 4th part is the conclusion, and the basic conclusion is drawn in view of the current problem of complaint petition and visit, which includes the principle of solving the problem of complaint petition and visiting and the countermeasure of solving the problem of petition and visit. Part 4th is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】:西北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D632.8;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李玮;刘莉;郭志博;;涉法涉诉信访案件的预防及应对机制[J];党政干部学刊;2008年10期
2 郭小冬;;判后答疑制度评析[J];法商研究;2007年01期
3 张志铭;;对中国建立案例指导制度的基本认识[J];法制资讯;2011年01期
4 李茂华;陈雪梅;;法院涉诉信访制度之利弊分析及进路选择[J];广东行政学院学报;2008年04期
5 朱最新;朱孔武;;信访制度的法理探析[J];河北法学;2006年06期
6 周永坤;;信访潮与中国纠纷解决机制的路径选择[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期
7 刘化雷;;涉法涉诉信访问题研究[J];技术与市场;2009年12期
8 应星;作为特殊行政救济的信访救济[J];法学研究;2004年03期
9 李俊;我国信访制度的成本收益分析[J];南京社会科学;2005年05期
10 姜凤武;李云波;;依法化解涉法涉诉信访问题的调查与思考[J];人民司法;2009年15期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 黄文忠;信访制度的法治化问题研究[D];河北师范大学;2008年
2 周涛;信访权保障研究[D];山东大学;2008年
本文编号:1563847
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1563847.html