司法地方保护主义话语批评

发布时间：2018-03-04 08:08

本文选题：地方保护主义　切入点：上级法院保护　出处：《法制与社会发展》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：地方保护主义话语体系在当代中国司法体制改革中处于主导性地位。司法地方保护主要发生在1990年代中期之前。1992年启动的经济、社会、政治的结构性变革,使得地方党政官员进行地方保护主义的激励逐渐弱化,障碍性条件增多。作为精于计算的理性人,诉讼当事人诉诸于上级法院对案件进行干预,不管是在一审还是二审中,在成本—收益计算和风险量值上都优于诉诸于地方党政官员,因此其成为优选方案。来自上级法院的意见或没有正式行文的打招呼,成为审判中外部干预的主要形态。以抑制地方同级党政机关干预,倚重上级法院管理为内容的研究,错置了基本的关注方向。
[Abstract]:The discourse system of local protectionism plays a leading role in the reform of the judicial system in contemporary China. Judicial local protection mainly occurred before the mid-1990s. In 1992, it started the structural changes of economy, society and politics. The incentive for local party and government officials to carry out local protectionism is gradually weakened and the obstacles are increased. As a rational person who is good at calculation, litigants resort to a higher court to intervene in the case, whether in the first or second instance. Superior to local party and government officials in terms of cost-benefit calculations and risk values, so it becomes a preferred option. Advice from a higher court or no formal greeting. It has become the main form of external intervention in the trial. The research on restraining the interference of local party and government organs at the same level and relying on the management of higher courts has misplaced the basic direction of attention.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“我国法院组织的深层结构研究”(14BFX052)
【分类号】：D926.1

【相似文献】