社会转型期能动司法的法治意蕴

发布时间：2018-03-05 01:16

本文选题：法治　切入点：能动司法　出处：《黑龙江社会科学》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法治作为一种治国方略已经被纳入宪法和党章,这一点毋庸置疑。社会转型期,国家提出能动司法是一种不得已的折中和屈服。而过分强调能动司法则有违法治理念,挑战着立法机关的权威,甚至在某种程度上,使能动司法成为了政治的奴隶,破坏了法体系的内部价值体系。厘清能动司法的利与弊、破解能动司法的消极谜题、把握能动司法积极的法治意蕴非常重要。而要想准确把握能动司法的法治意蕴,一是要在原则上恪守司法被动裁判的本质属性;二是理清法官能动性的边界,包括明确司法解释边界和避免息诉或拒绝裁判的倾向;三是真正将一切社会矛盾纳入司法的管辖;四是要回归到制定法本身的不断完善的法治应有之义上来。
[Abstract]:There is no doubt that the rule of law, as a strategy of governing the country, has been incorporated into the Constitution and the Constitution of the Party. During the period of social transformation, the state put forward that active justice is a necessary compromise and submission, while too much emphasis on active justice is contrary to the concept of the rule of law. It challenges the authority of the legislature, even to some extent, makes the active justice become the slave of politics, destroys the internal value system of the legal system, clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the active justice, and solves the negative puzzles of the active justice. It is very important to grasp the positive legal implication of active judicature. In order to accurately grasp the legal implication of active judicature, one is to abide by the essential attribute of judicial passive adjudication in principle, the other is to clear up the boundary of judges' initiative. It includes clarifying the boundary of judicial interpretation and the tendency of avoiding interest or refusing judgment; third, bringing all social contradictions into the jurisdiction of the judiciary; fourth, returning to the legal system of law itself.
【作者单位】：哈尔滨学院;
【基金】：哈尔滨学院青年博士科研基金项目“中国经济转型期的法治意蕴”(HUDF2013-002)
【分类号】：D916

【参考文献】