论传媒和司法的差异与互动

发布时间：2018-03-05 01:19

  本文选题：传媒　切入点：司法　出处：《学术交流》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：传媒与司法在价值、思维模式和语言风格等层面都存在着一些不同,对二者的关系需要进行全新的认识。传媒只是公众知情权的集中表达,因此多数学者认为传媒对司法具有监督作用的定位也不够准确。尽管如此,在权衡传媒介入司法的风险和价值之后,我们选择倾向于传媒自由。但是,对于传媒介入司法的方式和尺度仍需斟酌。在审判前、审判中和审判后,传媒介入的尺度应当有所差别,司法也应当采取积极的措施去应对传媒的介入,这样才有利于最终形成二者之间的良性互动。
[Abstract]:There are some differences in value, thinking mode and language style between the media and the judicature, so it is necessary to have a new understanding of the relationship between the two. The media is only the centralized expression of the public's right to know. Therefore, most scholars believe that the position of the media in its supervisory role in the administration of justice is not accurate. Nevertheless, after weighing the risks and values of media intervention in the administration of justice, we choose to prefer media freedom. The way and scale of media intervention in the administration of justice still need to be considered. Before, during and after the trial, the scale of media intervention should be different, and the judiciary should also take positive measures to deal with the media intervention. Only in this way can the positive interaction between the two be formed.
【作者单位】： 吉林师范大学政法学院;上海市人民检察院第二分院;
【基金】：吉林省社会科学基金项目“刑事视域中的老年人权利保障研究”(2014B129)
【分类号】：D926
，

本文编号：1568134