论网络证据保全公证的风险与防范

发布时间：2018-03-05 20:20

本文选题：网络证据保全公证　切入点：风险　出处：《上海交通大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：网络证据保全公证是公证行业的一项新型业务，具有高度专业性的特点。但是，目前网络证据保全公证在司法裁判中的风险发生率却远远高于其他公证，由于网络证据保全公证文书在制作中的不规范、受其他因素干扰导致证明力不足而不被法院采信的例子屡见不鲜。网络证据保全公证的瑕疵类型主要有形式上的和实质上的，产生原因主要是由于电子证据自身的易变性、公证员对网络和计算机知识缺乏了解以及目前网络证据保全公证活动缺乏完善的法律保障造成的。因此，公证员在办理网络证据保全公证时，首先在受理公证申请时应尽到对申请人、申请地等要素的形式性审查责任；其次在实际办证过程中，对于网络证据保全公证的操作人、操作地点、保全内容记录的完整性、记录手段的合法性等涉及实质性效力的事项都应当审慎和负责，才能通过公证书最大程度的还原和记录涉网的法律事实和法律行为，，为当事人进行诉讼和法院认定事实提供有力的证据，树立公证行业良好的社会形象。同时，司法界应当尽快形成统一的网络证据保全公证效力的认定标准，公证行业亦应当不断对如何构建完善的网络证据保全公证体系进行探索。
[Abstract]:The notarization of network evidence preservation is a new type of business in notarization industry, which is highly specialized. However, at present, the risk rate of network evidence preservation notarization in judicial adjudication is much higher than that of other notaries. Because the network evidence preserves the notarization document in the production nonstandard, by the other factor interference causes the proof to be insufficient but does not accept the court to trust the example is common. The types of defects in the preservation of notarization of network evidence are mainly formal and substantial, and the reasons are mainly due to the variability of electronic evidence itself. Notaries lack of understanding of network and computer knowledge and lack of perfect legal protection of network evidence preservation. Therefore, when dealing with the notarization of network evidence preservation, notaries should, first of all, perform the formal examination responsibility for the applicant, the place of application, and other elements when accepting the application for notarization; secondly, in the process of actually handling the certificate, The operator, the place of operation, the integrity of the preservation of the content record, the legality of the means of recording, and other matters concerning the substantive effectiveness of the notarization of the network evidence should be carefully and responsibly maintained, Only by reducing and recording the legal facts and acts of the network to the greatest extent can the notaries provide strong evidence for the litigants and the courts to determine the facts and establish a good social image of the notarization profession. At the same time, the judicial circles should form the unified network evidence preservation notarization validity confirmation standard as soon as possible, the notarization profession also should continue to explore how to construct the perfect network evidence preservation notarization system.
【学位授予单位】：上海交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.6

【参考文献】