论司法判决的可接受性

发布时间：2018-03-09 10:55

本文选题：判决　切入点：可接受性　出处：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国目前正处于大力开展法治建设的时期,法律作为调整社会关系的工具其重要性日益增强,司法判决作为一项具有法律效力的定纷止争的决断,围绕其产生的一些问题在我国法治建设中应当被予以重视;与此同时,社会对司法判决的期望值也越来越高,传统的以强制性为特征的司法己经不能满足人们解决纠纷的需要。司法作为纠纷解决的最后一道防线,能够获得整个社会成员的接受是化解矛盾、解决纠纷、构建法治社会的关键,只有当事人接受、社会成员认同,即接受判决,司法判决的结果才能得到很好的遵守,从而一次性地、真正地解决纠纷。本文旨在对判决可接受性的相关问题做出论述。本文主要分为以下四部分进行论述: 第一部分:判决可接受性的概述。此部分主要介绍了判决可接受性的内涵及其特点、标准。所谓判决的可接受性,是指法院做出的判决所具有的能够让判决受众认同、信任和接受的属性;判决可接受性同时具有主观性、社会性、多元性的特点;判决可接受性具有的较低层次的标准——服从及其较高层次的标准——服气。第二部分:判决可接受性的现状及必要性。此部分介绍了我国目前司法判决的弊端,“执行难”和“二次冲突”以及上访、申诉现象频繁,从而导致司法权威的丧失。同时,由于司法和法律具有社会属性,所以必须追求其社会效果,这是解决纠纷,构建法治社会的必然要求。第三部分:影响判决可接受性的因素。判决可接受性受很多因素的制约,包括文化心理因素、立法因素、司法因素、主体因素以及技术因素等。笔者将从各个方面对其进行阐述。第四部分:增强司法判决可接受性的建议。其一,要完善立法,克服我国立法固有的局限性。其二,要改革司法体制,严格贯彻司法独立、司法公开、正当程序的原则。其三,提高司法主体素质,加强法官职业道德建设、提高法官专业素质、塑造现代的司法理念。最后,从实用性和可操作性角度改进判决理由的形成路径。
[Abstract]:China is vigorously carry out the construction of the rule of law, the law as the tool of adjusting social relationship and its increasing importance, judicial decisions as a settling legal disputes resolution, should be paid attention to some problems about the rule of law in China; at the same time, the social expectations of judicial judgment the value is also more and more high, the traditional characteristics of a mandatory to the judiciary has been unable to meet the needs of people to solve disputes. The last defense line of the judicial dispute resolution as the access to the members of the community to accept is to resolve contradictions and disputes, the key construction of the rule of law, only the parties to accept members of society, identity, i.e. accept the verdict, the result of judicial decisions can be very good to comply with, and at once, the real solution to the dispute. This paper aims at the problems related to the acceptability of the judgment This article is mainly divided into the following four parts:
The first part: the overview of acceptability judgments. This part mainly introduces the connotation of sentence acceptability and characteristics, the so-called standard. The acceptability of verdict, refers to the decision made by the court to make decisions with the audience recognition, trust and acceptance of the property; the decision could be accepted by the society is subjective. And a plurality of characteristics; decision criteria for acceptable lower level with higher level and obey standard extent.
The second part: the status of acceptability judgments and necessity. This part introduces the shortcomings of our current judicial decisions, "difficult to execute" and "the two conflict" and the petition, the phenomenon of frequent complaints, resulting in the loss of judicial authority. At the same time, because of the judicial and law with social attribute, it must pursue its social effect, which is to solve the disputes, building the rule of law necessary.
The third part: the factors that affect the acceptability of adjudicature. The acceptability of adjudicatory is restricted by many factors, including cultural and psychological factors, legislative factors, judicial factors, subjective factors and technical factors.
The fourth part: to enhance the acceptability of the recommendations of judicial decisions. First, we must perfect the legislation, to overcome the limitations inherent in our legislation. Secondly, to reform the judicial system, strictly implement the judicial independence, judicial openness, the principles of due process. Thirdly, improve the quality of judicial body, strengthen the judge occupation moral construction, improve the judge professional quality, shaping the modern concept of justice. Finally, from the practical and operational perspective to improve the formation of ground path decision.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】