法院调解社会化问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 17:28

本文选题：调解社会化　切入点：法院　出处：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：法院调解社会化不仅是指导司法实践的重要的程序理念,而且也是实现法院与社会共治的社会治理方式。法院调解社会化更多的是司法实践的一种制度性创新,但是,实然的法院调解社会化程序运作滋生了很多程序问题,特别是委托调解的法律缺位造成了各地各级法院的调解模式的巨大差异。为了真正实现法院与社会的协同共治,我国不但要对在法律中明确规定委托调解,而且更应该确立法院调解社会化的程序保障和制度配套。本文的主体部分,分为四章: 第一章是法院调解社会化概述。本章首先界定法院调解社会化的涵义,指出法院调解社会化不是一种纠纷解决机制,而是一种程序理念和社会治理方式,然后剖析法院调解社会化的主要表现形式,详尽分析协助调解与委托调解的关系。本章继而指出法院调解社会化是顺应国际调解社会化的潮流,也是应对我国民事案件剧增的社会的现实的理性选择,其正当性基础在于当事人本位。第二章是法院调解社会化的运作模式考察。本章详尽考察了北京市朝阳区人民法院的诉前调解模式、上海市长宁区人民法院的“人民调解窗口”、南通市的“大调解”机制、浙江省的“诉调衔接机制”以及莆田的“诉调对接”机制,继而从主导机构、法院角色、调解主体、表现形式、程序衔接和调解经费六个层面概括法院调解社会化的共同的程序机理。第三章是我国法院调解社会化的现实困境。法院调解社会化在各级各地的法院运作过程中出现了很多程序问题,使得其陷入一定的制度困境。这些问题包括:委托调解立法的缺位,并且造成委托调解的程序比较简单;诉前委托调解削弱了对当事人的诉权保障;调解的具体表现形式发展极不平衡;专业化的调解人队伍的阙如以及调解经费严重短缺。同时,文章运用实证的方法剖析了法院调解社会化的问题造成的困境。第四章是我国法院调解社会化的制度建构。文章针对法院调解社会化的现实困境,提出了有针对性的完善措施。首先要从法律上明确规定委托调解制度,这就需要综合采取四种方案,尤其要制定《社会调解法》。法律制定过程中要详尽规定法院调解社会化的领导机构和工作机构,建立立案预登记制度,保障当事人诉权的正当行使,正确处理当事人的自治与法院权威的关系,规定诉前强制调解制度,发挥多元调解力量的合力,建立专业化的调解人队伍,落实调解保密性原则,多元化保障调解经费的充裕。
[Abstract]:The socialization of court mediation is not only an important procedural concept to guide judicial practice, but also a way of social governance to realize the common governance between the court and society. The socialization of court mediation is more a kind of institutional innovation of judicial practice, but, The actual operation of the social procedure of court mediation has created many procedural problems, especially the absence of the law of entrusting mediation has caused great differences in the mediation modes of the courts at all levels in various places. In order to truly realize the cooperation between the court and the society, Our country should not only explicitly stipulate entrusting mediation in the law, but also establish the procedural guarantee and system matching for the socialization of court mediation. The main part of this paper is divided into four chapters:. The first chapter is an overview of the socialization of court mediation. Firstly, this chapter defines the meaning of the socialization of court mediation, pointing out that the socialization of court mediation is not a dispute resolution mechanism, but a procedural concept and social governance. Then it analyzes the main manifestations of the socialization of court mediation, and analyzes in detail the relationship between assisted mediation and entrusted mediation. This chapter then points out that the socialization of court mediation conforms to the trend of the socialization of international mediation. It is also a rational choice to deal with the rapid increase of civil cases in our country, and its legitimacy is based on the litigant standard. The second chapter is an investigation of the mode of operation of the socialization of court mediation. This chapter examines in detail the pre-litigation mediation model of the Chaoyang District people's Court in Beijing, the "people's Mediation window" of the Changning District people's Court in Shanghai, and the "Great Mediation" mechanism of Nantong City. Zhejiang Province's "the connection mechanism of litigation and regulation" and Putian's "suit and tune connection" mechanism, and then from the leading institutions, the role of the court, the main body of mediation, the form of expression, This paper summarizes the common procedural mechanism of the socialization of court mediation from six aspects of procedure convergence and mediation funds. The third chapter is the realistic dilemma of the socialization of court mediation in our country. There are many procedural problems in the process of the socialization of court mediation at all levels. These problems include: the absence of legislation on entrustment mediation, the simple procedure of entrusting mediation, the weakening of the protection of litigant's right of action by entrustment mediation before litigation; The concrete manifestation of mediation is very unbalanced, the lack of specialized mediators and the serious shortage of mediation funds. At the same time, the article analyzes the dilemma caused by the socialization of court mediation by using the empirical method. Chapter 4th is the system construction of the socialization of the court mediation in our country. In view of the realistic predicament of the socialization of the court mediation, the article puts forward some pertinent measures to perfect it. First of all, we should clearly stipulate the entrustment mediation system from the legal point of view. This requires comprehensive adoption of four programs, in particular the formulation of the Law on Social Mediation. In the process of formulating the law, the leading and working bodies of the socialization of court mediation should be specified in detail, and a pre-registration system should be established. To ensure the proper exercise of the litigants' right of action, to correctly handle the relationship between party autonomy and the authority of the court, to stipulate the system of compulsory mediation before litigation, to give play to the joint forces of multiple mediation forces, to establish a professional contingent of mediators, and to implement the principle of confidentiality of mediation, Diversification guarantees adequate funding for mediation.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.14;D926.2

【参考文献】