司法能动论:历史考察与现实评价

发布时间：2018-03-23 13:38

本文选题：司法能动主义　切入点：司法能动论　出处：《法学杂志》2013年08期

【摘要】："司法能动主义"是舶来品,而"司法能动论"则是司法能动主义结合中国国情的产物,尽管后者被赋予了不少"新意"和"引申义",但客观地说,这也是文化接受与传播过程中一种不可避免的现象。从法文化的深层渊源看,我国属于"大陆法系"国家,法官奉行"司法克制"的传统,从而大大抑制了"司法能动"的空间,但社会生活的快速变化与成文法废、改、立的滞后性这一矛盾又会呼唤"司法能动"的出场,以弥补法律的缺陷,达到实质正义的目标。这就为司法能动在大陆法系国家司法实践中的存在提供了一席之地。司法能动是司法克制前提下的能动,不是盲动妄动;司法克制又包容了司法能动的合理空间,不是对法律条文的僵化固守。两者追求的目标是相同的,即正义的实现、人权的彰显。
[Abstract]:"Judicial activism" is an import, while "judicial activism" is the product of judicial activism combined with China's national conditions. Although the latter has been endowed with many "new ideas" and "cited meanings", it is said objectively. This is also an inevitable phenomenon in the process of cultural acceptance and dissemination. From the deep source of legal culture, our country belongs to the "continental law system" country, and the judge pursues the tradition of "judicial restraint". Thus, the space of "judicial initiative" was greatly restrained, but the contradiction between the rapid changes of social life and the abolition of statutory law, the lag of reform and establishment, would call for the appearance of "judicial initiative" in order to make up for the defects of the law. To achieve the goal of substantive justice. This provides a place for the existence of judicial initiative in the judicial practice of countries of continental law system. Judicial initiative is the initiative under the premise of judicial restraint, not blind action; Judicial restraint also contains the reasonable space of judicial action, not the rigid adherence to the legal provisions. The two pursue the same goal, that is, the realization of justice and the manifestation of human rights.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】