当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

我国司法实践中调解替代判决现象的法理学思考

发布时间:2018-03-29 07:07

  本文选题:调解 切入点:判决 出处:《内蒙古大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:调解代替判决的现象是我国执行着重调解、调解优先的司法政策的过程中出现的新现象,主要是指法院和法官在面对纠纷的时候优先选择调解、当判不判、久调不判、以调代判等现象。这种结案方式有它的历史传统和现实合理性,但在实践过程中它的不科学性和负面影响也逐渐凸显。本文拟从法理学的角度对此现象进行分析,首先论述了调解与判决的内涵、功效和逻辑关系;进而对司法实践中调解代替判决的现象进行分析,从统计学和发生学的角度综合分析这种现象;接着是对司法实践中调解代替判决现象的成因的分析,主要从从历史性方面分析这种现象的成因;同时结合实证分析了司法实践中调解代替判决现象的消极影响。最后论述如何克服司法实践中调解代替审判现象,如何避免这种现象的负面影响。 我们认为调解代替判决的现象是在司法实践中逐渐产生发展的,有其合理性的一面。然而,长久以来,法律从业者对这种现象已经习以为常,对它的消极影响一直避而不见。在“大调解”机制逐步构建的今天,调解代替判决的现象的负面影响将会日益放大。如何在司法实践中尽可能地消除这一现象,避免这一现象的消极影响,将调解和判决合理有效地运用,使其更符合法律的精神,更好地维护当事人的利益,是值得立法者和法官们思考的。
[Abstract]:The phenomenon that mediation takes the place of judgment is a new phenomenon in the course of carrying out the judicial policy of emphasizing mediation and giving priority to mediation in our country. It mainly refers to the court and judges giving priority to mediation in the face of disputes. This method has its historical tradition and realistic rationality, but its unscientific and negative influence is gradually prominent in the process of practice. This paper intends to analyze this phenomenon from the angle of jurisprudence. First of all, it discusses the connotation, efficacy and logical relationship of mediation and judgment, and then analyzes the phenomenon of mediation replacing judgment in judicial practice, and analyzes this phenomenon comprehensively from the angle of statistics and genesis. Then it analyzes the causes of the phenomenon of mediation instead of judgment in judicial practice, mainly from the historical aspects of the causes of this phenomenon; At the same time, it analyzes the negative influence of mediation instead of judgment in judicial practice. Finally, it discusses how to overcome the phenomenon of mediation instead of trial in judicial practice and how to avoid the negative influence of this phenomenon. We believe that the phenomenon of mediation in place of judgment develops gradually in judicial practice and has a reasonable side. However, legal practitioners have been accustomed to this phenomenon for a long time. The negative influence of mediation has been avoided all the time. With the gradual construction of the mechanism of "Great Mediation", the negative influence of mediation in place of judgment will be magnified day by day. How to eliminate this phenomenon as far as possible in judicial practice? To avoid the negative influence of this phenomenon, to use mediation and judgment reasonably and effectively, to make it more in line with the spirit of the law and to better safeguard the interests of the parties, is worthy of consideration by legislators and judges.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 周永坤;;论强制性调解对法治和公平的冲击[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2007年03期

2 翁晓斌;论法院调解制度改革[J];现代法学;2000年05期

3 徐龙震;;对构建我国法院专职调解官制度的思考[J];中共长春市委党校学报;2006年01期



本文编号:1680078

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1680078.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户05a1b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com