关于我国司法改革中去行政化问题的探讨

发布时间：2018-04-01 10:35

本文选题：司法改革　切入点：去行政化　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：三十多年的司法改革现已经形成基本的目标，主要围绕司法标准重建—司法中审判的具体改革—司法体制的改革这一方向。在最近发展的近二十年间我国的法律制度逐渐完善，不仅建立了科学的司法理念，还取得了良好的司法效果。然而，回顾这些年的司法改革，改革进程依旧缓慢，具体表现为司法改革步伐缓慢、改革理念趋于保守、改革政治色彩有增无减以及改革工作再度陷入困境等。而且，在具体的改革过程中也有很多的问题：如法院系统改革与检察系统改革基本上是各自为政、各搞一套，相当多的改革举措缺乏统一性、规范性和前瞻性，，刚刚推出不久便陷入再改革的尴尬境地；众多改革举措与现行的法律法规相抵触，合法性与正当性不足；许多改革措施的推出往往着眼于某项改革的“全国第一”而急于提出目标和任务，但任务完成的过程却陷入行政化；不同地区间的司法改革进展不够平衡，改革措施的落实出现进展不一、效果不同的局面等等。本文从该课题的研究背景和意义入手，首先详细分析了司法行政化的具体表现，我国司法在实际的发展过程中有自己的管理体制、物质保障行政化、上下级之间行政化，这些对于司法活动都是有影响的，尤其是对司法独立、司法的公信力及效率方面有很大的影响。最后从司法改革过程的公开化、司法改革路径的专业化以及司法改革理念的科学化三个方面提出了司法改革去行政化的思路。
[Abstract]:The judicial reform of more than 30 years has already formed the basic goal, mainly revolves around the judicial standard reconstruction-the judicial trial concrete reform-the judicial system reform. In the recent 20 years, the legal system of our country has gradually improved. Not only have scientific judicial ideas been established, but also good judicial results have been achieved. However, looking back on the judicial reform in recent years, the process of reform is still slow, the concrete manifestation of which is that the pace of judicial reform is slow, and the reform ideas tend to be conservative. The political color of the reform has been increasing and the reform work is once again in trouble. Moreover, there are also many problems in the specific reform process: for example, the reform of the court system and the procuratorial system are basically separate and each has its own set of policies. Quite a lot of reform measures lack of unity, standardization and foresight, they have just been put into the awkward situation of re-reform, many reform measures conflict with the current laws and regulations, and the legitimacy and legitimacy of the reform measures are insufficient; The introduction of many reform measures tends to focus on the "national first" of a given reform and is eager to put forward goals and tasks, but the process of completing the task has fallen into an administrative situation; the progress of judicial reform among different regions has not been balanced. This paper starts with the research background and significance of the subject, and analyzes in detail the concrete performance of the administration of justice. Our country's judicature has its own management system in the actual development process, the material guarantee is administrated, and the upper and lower levels are administrated. All these have an impact on judicial activities, especially on the independence of the judiciary. Finally, the author puts forward the idea of judicial reform deadministration from three aspects: the openness of judicial reform process, the specialization of judicial reform path and the scientization of judicial reform idea.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】