司法公开理论及实证研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 21:18

本文选题：司法公开　切入点：国外范式　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：司法公开是提升司法公信力，遏制司法腐败，维护司法公正的重要手段。近年来，在各级法院的努力推动下，我国的司法公开工作取得了一定的成效，司法透明的意识有了明显提升、司法公开的范围有所扩大，司法公开的方式也不断创新。但是从总体情况来看，我国的司法公开情况还存在不少问题。本文在调研了美国最高联邦法院、新西兰法院等的司法公开的基础上，结合我国法院通过网站公开司法信息的情况，总结了我国司法公开存在的不足，提出了改善的建议。本文在参考当前我国诸多著作及研究成果的基础上，结合对国内外法院网站的实践调研，对我国的司法公开进行了理论以及实证研究。本文第一部分从理论上阐述了司法公开的概念和意义。第二部分介绍了美国联邦最高法院网站和新西兰法院网站的建设情况，指出美国联邦最高法院网站和新西兰法院网在公开司法信息方面可资借鉴的地方。第三部分分析了我国司法公开的现状，从当前我国司法公开的立法情况以及法院网站的司法公开实践情况总结出我国司法公开工作存在的问题。本文的第四部分提出了我国司法公开的完善路径，通过提高司法透明度，，达到司法为民和司法公正的司法理念。
[Abstract]:Judicial openness is an important means to enhance judicial credibility, curb judicial corruption and maintain judicial justice. In recent years, with the efforts of courts at all levels, the work of judicial openness in our country has achieved certain results. The awareness of judicial transparency has obviously improved, the scope of judicial openness has been expanded, and the way of judicial disclosure has been innovated. But from the overall situation, There are still many problems in judicial disclosure in our country. Based on the investigation of the judicial openness of the Supreme Federal Court of the United States, the New Zealand Court, and so on, this paper combines the situation of the courts of our country to make the judicial information public through the website. This paper summarizes the shortcomings of judicial publicity in our country, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. On the basis of referring to many works and research achievements in our country, this paper combines the practical investigation and research on the domestic and foreign court websites. The first part of this paper expounds the concept and significance of judicial disclosure theoretically. The second part introduces the construction of the website of the United States Supreme Court and the New Zealand Court. The article points out that the website of the United States Supreme Court and the New Zealand Court Network can be used for reference in the field of open judicial information. The third part analyzes the current situation of judicial disclosure in China. From the current legislation situation of judicial publicity in our country and the judicial publicity practice of the court website, the problems existing in the judicial publicity work in our country are summarized. The fourth part of this paper puts forward the perfect path of judicial openness in our country. Through improving the judicial transparency, we can achieve the judicial concept of judicial justice for the people and judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】