民意干预司法的法理分析

发布时间：2018-04-01 21:46

本文选题：司法　切入点：民意　出处：《中南民族大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前，随着经济、社会的发展，我国的法治建设也在不断进步，但在发展过程中也产生了诸多不和谐因素，其中民意与司法的紧张关系已经慢慢凸显，特别是随着微博、博客等新兴网络平台的发展，二者的关系变得尤为突出，民意不当干预司法无疑极大的削弱了司法的公信力，影响了人们对法律的信仰。因此，对民意干预司法进行法理分析对于降低民意对司法的消极影响具有重要的借鉴意义。本文着眼于中国社会现实和司法现状，站在法理学的高度，以理论与实践相结合为原则，澄清了民意与司法的关系，探索出民意与司法整合的机制，通过民意与司法之间的制度建构，通过程序化机制运作来实现民意与司法的沟通与协调，使民意可以通过合法正当的途径进入到司法运作过程中来，使得民意在可以控制的范围内活动，通过民意表达的合法化与正当化，达到民意与司法之间的良性互动，从而使民意在社会中发挥更为积极的作用。本文的内容有以下四个方面：第一部分为民意与司法概述。要想实现民意对司法的正当干预必须先分析民意和司法的基本概念，这是前提和基础。在这部分，首先充分分析了中国古代及国外关于民意的阐述，提出了自己对于民意的看法，然后提出了民意的特点，同时结合文章所述提出了民意的本质，最后提出了民意与司法的关系。第二部分为民意干预司法的涵义和类型。民意干预司法的类型在当前国内外学者的论述中少有甚至少有提及，，是笔者根据自己分析提出的涵义与分类。在这部分，先分析了民意干预司法的类型，然后根据不同的分类标准提出民意干预司法的类型。第三部分为民意干预司法的利弊分析。根据第二部分可知，民意干预司法不仅包括民意对司法的正当干预也包括民意对司法的不正当干预，因此民意干预司法是既有利也有弊的。在这部分，分析了民意干预司法的益处包括弥补法律不足、克服司法形式主义不足等三个方面，而民意干预司法的弊端包括影响司法独立、有损司法权威等三个方面。第四部分为民意干预司法的法律控制。前文分析了民意干预司法的一些基本理论，但是我们最终的目的是通过对基本理论的分析得出民意与司法实现和谐的路径，这部分也是文章的最主要部分。在这部分，首先提出了法律控制的一般法律原则，主要有法治、法律至上、司法独立等四个原则。然后提出了法律控制的程序设计：民意的调查收集制度，民意的吸纳机制以及民意的疏导机制。最后提出了法律控制的具体路径，包括完善人民陪审员制度、量刑规范化改革等五个方面。
[Abstract]:At present, with the economic and social development, the rule of law in China is also in constant progress, but also produced many disharmonious factors in the development process, the tense relations between public opinion and judicature have been gradually highlighted, especially with micro-blog, the emerging network platform blog development, the relationship between the two has become particularly prominent public opinion, improper judicial intervention greatly undermined the credibility of the judiciary, affects people's faith in the law. Therefore, the legal analysis to reduce the negative impact of public opinion on judicial has important significance to public opinion of judicial intervention.
This paper focuses on the China social reality and judicial status, stand in jurisprudence, and the combination of theory and Practice for the principle, to clarify the relationship between public opinion and justice, to explore the mechanism of public opinion and judicial integration, through between public opinion and judicial system construction, through the program of the operation mechanism to realize the communication and coordination between public opinion and judicature the public opinion can make way through legitimate access to the judicial process, makes the public activities in the control range, through the expression of public opinion and legal justification, to achieve positive interaction between public opinion and judicature, so that public opinion play a more active role in society.
The contents of this paper are the following four aspects:
The first part is an overview of public opinion and judicature. In order to achieve thelegitimate public opinion on judicial intervention must first analyze the basic concepts of public opinion and judicature, which is the prerequisite and foundation. In this part, first China full analysis of the ancient Chinese and foreign public opinion explained, put forward their own views on public opinion, then put forward the opinion of the the characteristics, combined with the article described the nature of public opinion, finally puts forward the relationship between public opinion and justice.
The second part is the meaning of public opinion to intervene and type of justice. Judicial intervention in type of public opinion at home and abroad is discussed with a few or even less mentioned, is according to the analysis of connotation and classification is proposed. In this part, the first analysis of the types of public opinion of judicial intervention, then according to different classification criteria of type the public opinion of judicial intervention.
The third part is the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of public opinion to intervene in justice. The second part shows the opinion of judicial intervention includes not only the legitimate public opinion on judicial intervention including unfair public opinion on judicial intervention, so justice is the public opinion intervention has both advantages and disadvantages. In this part, the analysis of public opinion to intervene in judicial benefits to make up legal problems. To overcome the three aspects of judicial formalism is insufficient, and the drawbacks of public opinion to intervene in judicial influence judicial independence, there are three aspects of loss of judicial authority.
The fourth part is the legal control of the judicial opinion intervention. Above analysis some basic theory of judicial intervention of public opinion, but our ultimate goal is through the analysis of the basic theory of public opinion and judicial implementation of the path of harmony, the main part of this article is part of the. In this part, firstly put forward the general principles of law of legal control mainly, the rule of law, supremacy of law, judicial independence four principles. Then the legal control of the program design: public opinion survey collection system, absorb mechanisms of public opinion and public opinion guidance mechanism. Finally puts forward the specific path of legal control, including improving the people's jury system, five aspects of standardized sentencing reform.

【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D916

【参考文献】