损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行的影响
发布时间:2018-04-02 04:03
本文选题:损害赔偿 切入点:刑罚 出处:《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:司法实践中关于判决前的损害赔偿对刑罚产生影响的案例越来越多,但对其的争议却一直不断。判决前的损害赔偿是否应该影响刑罚?判决后的损害赔偿是否应当影响缓刑、假释?损害赔偿影响刑罚是否有条件?损害赔偿影响刑罚的案件范围有多广?损害赔偿影响刑罚的程度应多大?正是带着这一系列的问题,笔者进行了本文的写作。 除引言外,全文共分为三大主体部分。引言部分,主要介绍了本文的写作背景及写作思路,我国损害赔偿影响刑罚的判决引起众多民众质疑,使我们要认真思考目前司法实践中损害赔偿影响刑罚的判决是否合理及存在哪些问题;通过对这些问题及原因的分析,提出损害赔偿对刑罚产生合理性影响的一些建议。 第一部分主要是关于损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行的影响的概述。笔者首先介绍了损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行的影响的含义;接下来回顾了损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行的影响的兴起、发展、衰落及新的发展;最后着重分析了我国损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行的影响现状,指出了司法实践中损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行产生影响中存在的司法不统一、民众认同度低的问题,并对其原因进行了分析。 第二部分是关于损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行产生影响的合理性的分析。对损害赔偿影响刑罚持反对意见者认为,损害赔偿无论从其性质、还是公平性上看都不应影响刑罚。笔者从损害赔偿影响刑罚的合法性方面及理论根据方面、重要意义方面进行了详细分析,论证损害赔偿影响刑罚的合理性。损害赔偿既是悔罪的表现,也符合刑法的惩罚犯罪,保护被害人及犯罪人合法权益的目的,,既与罪行相适应原则不违背,又有利于我国摆脱损害赔偿率低的困境。国外关于损害赔偿的规定,也为我国损害赔偿影响刑罚制度提供了一些借鉴。 第三部分是在前两个部分论述的基础上,提出损害赔偿对刑罚裁量与执行产生合理性影响的建议。具体包括六个方面:一是完善我国关于损害赔偿对刑罚的影响方面的规定,确保法官处理这类案件时有明确的法律依据;二是司法实践中法官准确把握损害赔偿影响刑罚的幅度,减少量刑失当,实现司法统一;三是创新损害赔偿的方式,减少因平等性对损害赔偿影响刑罚产生的质疑并且增强损害赔偿对于犯罪人的教育意义;四是建立犯罪人财产调查、控制、追踪机制,以便能及时发现并强制执行犯罪人的财产。五是完善服刑人员的劳动薪酬制度,并将其薪酬的一部分支付给被害人,以减少被害人的损失;六是提升法官的业务素质和道德素质,以便更加准确地把握损害赔偿影响刑罚的标准,增强其处理个案的能力。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, there are more and more cases about the influence of pre-judgment damages on the penalty, but there are still many disputes about them. Should the pre-judgment damages affect the penalty? Should the damages after judgment affect probation and parole? Does damage compensation affect the condition of penalty? How wide is the scope of cases where damages affect penalties? To what extent should damages affect penalties? It is with this series of problems, the author of this paper. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into three main parts. The introduction mainly introduces the writing background and writing ideas of this article. So that we should seriously consider whether the judgment of damage compensation affecting penalty is reasonable and what problems exist in the current judicial practice, and put forward some suggestions on the reasonable influence of damage compensation on penalty through the analysis of these problems and reasons. The first part is a summary of the impact of damage compensation on penalty discretion and enforcement. Firstly, the author introduces the meaning of damage compensation on penalty discretion and enforcement; Then it reviews the rise, development, decline and new development of the impact of damage compensation on penalty discretion and enforcement. Finally, it analyzes the current situation of the impact of damage compensation on penalty discretion and enforcement in China. This paper points out the problems of judicial disunity and low level of public approval existing in the judicial practice in which damage compensation has an impact on penalty discretion and execution, and analyzes its causes. The second part is an analysis of the rationality of the impact of damage compensation on penalty discretion and enforcement. In terms of fairness, it should not affect the penalty. The author makes a detailed analysis from the aspects of the legality and the theoretical basis of the damage compensation affecting the penalty, as well as the significance of the damage compensation. It proves that damage compensation affects the rationality of penalty. Damage compensation is not only the manifestation of repentance, but also the punishment of crime in criminal law, and the purpose of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the victim and the offender, which is not contrary to the principle of adaptation to the crime. It is also helpful for our country to get rid of the predicament of low rate of compensation for damages. The foreign regulations on compensation for damages also provide some references for the influence of damages on the penalty system of our country. The third part is on the basis of the first two parts, put forward the reasonable influence of the damage compensation on the penalty discretion and execution, including six aspects: first, improve the provisions on the impact of damage compensation on the penalty. To ensure that there is a clear legal basis for judges to deal with such cases; second, to accurately grasp the extent of damage compensation affecting penalties in judicial practice, to reduce sentencing misconduct, and to achieve judicial unity; third, to innovate the way of compensation for damages, To reduce the doubt that the penalty of damage compensation is affected by equality and to enhance the educational significance of the damages to the offenders; fourthly, to establish a mechanism for the investigation, control and tracing of the criminal's property. In order to find and enforce the property of the offender in time. Fifth, improve the labor compensation system of prisoners, and pay part of the compensation to the victim, in order to reduce the loss of the victim; The sixth is to improve the professional and moral quality of judges in order to grasp more accurately the standard of damages affecting punishment and enhance their ability to deal with cases.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D926.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 刘伟;;在宽严相济刑事政策下解读赔钱减刑[J];法制与社会;2011年03期
2 何成兵;;“赔钱减刑”的法律定位与价值探讨[J];法治研究;2010年05期
3 石经海;;“量刑规范化”解读[J];现代法学;2009年03期
4 石经海;;刑法现代化下的“量刑”解构——量刑规范化的科学基础探究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2010年03期
5 吕鸿雁;;“赔钱减刑”的合理性分析[J];科技咨询导报;2007年18期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 侯雪;刑事损害赔偿法律制度研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
本文编号:1698681
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1698681.html