行政公诉制度中检察机关的调查权研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 08:25

本文选题：行政公诉　切入点：检察机关　出处：《郑州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政公诉制度的实施关乎国家和公共利益,关乎检察权对行政权的有效监督和制约,虽然尚未建立,近年来理论界对此项制度却高度重视,对其在中国建立的必要性和可行性以及框架设计等方面都有了比较成熟的理念。“打官司就是打证据”,在当前的审判模式下,行政公诉的提起必须以掌握案件线索、拥有充分的证据为前提,否则检察机关可能会因举证不能而败诉。要想最大程度的发现案件真实,就必须经过调查,取证制度的不完善必然影响证据制度的功能在诉讼中的发挥。而当前法律不论是在民事诉讼还是行政诉讼领域,都对检察机关的调查权没有具体的规定,使检察机关在调查取证时暴露出许多不尽人意之处。作为行政公诉制度中必经程序,对调查问题的研究在当前就显得尤为迫切,也是本文写作的目的和意义所在。笔者立足于检察机关的证明责任和法律监督职能等方面阐释了赋予检察机关在行政公诉制度中调查权的必要性,并进一步在法律基础、实践基础等方面论述了其可行性。而后,用比较分析的方法对法院调查权、公安机关侦查权等作一考察并进行了简要分析,以对完善调查权这一权力提供借鉴。本文对调查权的行使原则—“依法独立原则”、“合理原则”、“接受监督原则”,调查的手段以及调查权的保障和规制等几个方面进行了具体的程序设计和构想,以其能让该权力最大限度地发挥积极作用。
[Abstract]:The implementation of the administrative public prosecution system is related to the national and public interests, and to the effective supervision and restriction of the procuratorial power to the administrative power. Although it has not yet been established, the theorists have attached great importance to this system in recent years.The necessity and feasibility of its establishment in China, as well as the framework design and other aspects have a more mature concept.In the current trial mode, the prosecution of administrative prosecution must grasp the clue of the case and have sufficient evidence as the premise, otherwise the procuratorial organ may lose the lawsuit because of the inability to prove the case.If we want to find out the truth of the case to the greatest extent, we must go through the investigation, and the imperfection of the evidence collection system will inevitably affect the function of the evidence system in the litigation.However, the current law, whether in the field of civil litigation or administrative litigation, has no specific provisions on the procuratorial organ's investigative power, which exposes many unsatisfactory points in the investigation and collection of evidence.As a necessary procedure in the administrative public prosecution system, the research on the investigation problem is particularly urgent at present, and is also the purpose and significance of this paper.Based on the proof responsibility of procuratorial organ and the function of legal supervision, the author explains the necessity of endowing the procuratorial organ with the right of investigation in the administrative public prosecution system, and further discusses its feasibility in the aspects of legal basis and practical basis.Then, the author makes a brief analysis of the investigation power of the court and the investigation power of the public security organs with the method of comparative analysis, in order to provide a reference for perfecting the power of investigation.This article has carried on the concrete procedure design and the conception to the principle of "independence according to law", "the reasonable principle", "accept the supervision principle", the means of investigation and the safeguard and regulation of the right of investigation, etc.In order to maximize this power to play a positive role.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.3;D926.3

【参考文献】