从演化博弈看“司法裁判”的本质和完善——行为策略实验的视角

发布时间：2018-04-02 11:40

本文选题：司法裁判　切入点：公平　出处：《自然辩证法通讯》2017年02期

【摘要】：双方合作博弈所证明的最佳行为策略是"一报还一报"。这种具备合作与惩罚的善良策略也符合最基本意义上的公平。从这个角度看,司法的本质就是公平的第三方惩罚或裁判,是"一报还一报"的高级版本,是人类合作公平的体现。本文尝试从司法产生的情境基础进行研究,首先探讨"双方合作博弈"的情境,推导出双方博弈的最佳策略模式是"一报还一报"。其次,进而推导出"第三方裁判"是大规模合作博弈的最佳或较优的群体策略,是"一报还一报"的升级版。最后,对于"第三方裁判"在实践中可能出现的最重要的缺陷进行研究,并探讨对该缺陷的解决方式——重返"一报还一报"的惩罚、监督或制衡。
[Abstract]:The best behavior strategy proved by the cooperative game between the two sides is "one reward for another". This kind of good strategy with cooperation and punishment also accords with the most basic sense of fairness. From this perspective, the essence of justice is fair third party punishment or judgment. It is an advanced version of "one newspaper for one newspaper", which is the embodiment of human cooperation fairness. This paper tries to study the situation basis of judicature, and first discusses the situation of "cooperative game between two sides". It is deduced that the best strategy model of game between two parties is "one report and one newspaper". Secondly, it is deduced that "third party referee" is the best or better group strategy of large-scale cooperative game, and it is an upgraded version of "one newspaper for one newspaper". This paper studies the most important defect that may appear in the practice of "third party referee", and probes into the way to solve this defect, that is, to return to punishment, supervision or checks and balances.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：“教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(项目编号:14YJC820055)《司法公正之行为实验研究》福建省软科学项目《企业技术创新的激励政策之实证研究——调查与行为实验的方法》(项目编号:2014R0085) 厦门大学人文社会科学“校长基金创新团队”课题《法理学前沿问题研究》(课题编号:20720171006);”
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】