司法民主的空间:必要性、可能性及限度

发布时间：2018-04-04 00:45

本文选题：司法民主　切入点：必要性　出处：《云南社会科学》2013年01期

【摘要】：基于基本政治制度安排与提升司法权威的双重诉求,司法民主构成了当下中国司法改革的必然选择。法律论证理论为司法民主前提下的司法安排进行了可能性论证,这一论证在总体上抛弃了古典的、将司法看作法律精英操纵下的封闭活动的认识,并试图构建一种开放的、发生于司法活动过程中的多方协商与沟通机制。司法民主亦有其存在限度,由于"法治"的预设性,任何司法民主实践都必须以法律文本的有效性为前提,为了实现这一要求,中国未来的司法民主实践必须抛弃"舍法求法"的浪漫主义诉求,进一步探索由简单经验思维向法律思维转化的机制,将司法民主参与各方对法律文本之尊重义务具体化、责任化。
[Abstract]:Based on the dual demands of the basic political system arrangement and the promotion of judicial authority, judicial democracy constitutes the inevitable choice of the current judicial reform in China.The theory of legal argumentation has carried on the possibility argument for the judicial arrangement under the premise of judicial democracy. In general, this argument has abandoned the classical understanding that the judicature is regarded as a closed activity under the control of the legal elite, and tries to construct an open one.Multi-party consultation and communication mechanism in the process of judicial activities.Judicial democracy also has its limits. Due to the presupposition of "rule of law", any judicial democratic practice must be based on the validity of legal texts.In the future, China's judicial democracy practice must abandon the romantic demand of "seeking the law", further explore the mechanism of transforming from simple experience thinking to legal thinking, and concretize the obligation of all parties involved in judicial democracy to respect the legal text.Responsibility.
【作者单位】：合肥师范学院马克思主义中国化研究所;山东大学哲学与社会发展学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“解决人民内部矛盾的基本制度保证和具体制度建设”(项目号:08BKS035)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】