难以辨识的法院庭审管理——以药家鑫案庭审发放意见表为中心

发布时间：2018-04-10 06:26

本文选题：药家鑫　切入点：庭审管理　出处：《北方法学》2012年03期

【摘要】：药家鑫案引发了颇多可供讨论的法律问题,比如媒体与司法的关系、司法民主与司法公正的关联等。仅就一审法院在庭审中发放"旁听案件反馈意见表"的行为来说,就可以映射出许多关于当前中国司法改革的样态。究其本质,发放意见表实则难属司法行为或审判行为,其更多地表现为一种法院的管理行为。从庭审管理的角度而言,这一行为彰显了在当前集权体制下行政化的法院管理模式逐渐难堪的现实,同时也反映了当前法院还算占绝对优势控制的庭审管理环节深受媒体和舆论的压制而艰难前行的无奈,并且还反映了法院在以政治为首要职能的高压下难以实施专业性技能管理的困境。
[Abstract]:The case of Yao Jiaxin raises many legal issues for discussion, such as the relationship between the media and the judiciary, the relationship between judicial democracy and judicial justice, and so on.As far as the first instance court is concerned, it is possible to map out a lot of patterns about the current judicial reform in China by issuing the "feedback form of overhearing cases" in the court of first instance.In essence, it is difficult to issue opinion form to judicial act or trial behavior, and it is more of a kind of court management behavior.From the perspective of trial management, this behavior highlights the reality that the administrative court management model is gradually embarrassing under the current centralized system.At the same time, it also reflects the helplessness of the court's trial management, which is still controlled by the absolute dominance of the court, being suppressed by the media and public opinion.It also reflects the difficult position of the court to implement professional skill management under the high pressure of politics as its primary function.
【作者单位】：华南理工大学法学院;中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国传统死刑文化研究”(项目编号2009JJD820011)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】