互联网环境下的审判公开“选择权”研究

发布时间：2018-04-11 05:03

本文选题：审判公开 + 程序正义　；参考：《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年06期

【摘要】：互联网环境拓展了审判公开的空间,使审判公开"选择权"的重要性越发突显。它一方面关系到社会公众是主动获取,还是被动接受审判信息;另一方面关系到社会公众获取"一手的"、全面的,还是"二手的"、部分的审判信息。互联网环境下审判公开"选择权"不仅有立法上的,而且有理论上的存在根据。以"利益保障说"和程序正义为理论根据,明确公开"选择权"主体,包括案件当事人、诉讼代理人、旁听人员、新闻媒体和社会公众,内容进一步分为传统公开方式、网络公开方式的方式选择权和庭审情况、裁判结果的具体内容公开选择权,人民法院在进行利益衡量后最终行使审判公开"决定权"。针对互联网环境下审判公开"选择权"行使提出建议,具体落实。
[Abstract]:Internet environment has expanded the space of open trial and made the importance of open trial option more prominent.On the one hand, it concerns whether the public can take the initiative to obtain or passively accept the information of trial; on the other hand, it is related to the public to obtain "first-hand", "comprehensive" or "second-hand", part of the trial information.Under Internet environment, open trial "option" not only has legislation, but also has theoretical basis.Based on the theory of "interest protection" and procedural justice, it is clear that the subject of open "right of choice", including the parties to the case, the agent ad litem, the observers, the news media and the public, is further divided into the traditional way of publicity.The right to choose the way and the trial, the concrete content of the judgment result, and the people's court finally exercise the decision of public trial after weighing the interests.In view of Internet environment trial open "option" exercise puts forward the proposal, implements concretely.
【作者单位】：重庆邮电大学法学院;
【基金】：重庆市社会科学规划项目:我国信息网络安全现状及其治理法治化研究(2015YBFX099) 中国博士后科学基金第58批面上资助项目:西部地区博士后人才资助计划(2015M582750XE) 重庆市博士后科研特别资助项目:大数据时代的信息安全危机与法律应对——以网络社会管理创新为视阈(XM2015118)
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】