侦查讯问阶段律师在场权研究

发布时间：2018-04-13 06:28

本文选题：侦查讯问 + 律师在场权　；参考：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革,要求加强对刑讯逼供和非法取证的源头预防,减少侦查讯问中的违法行为,推动审前侦查讯问制度的根本性改革。目前针对违法侦查行为,主要是通过实施非法证据排除规则进行事后救济。这种事后救济程序复杂、效果不容易实现,难以达到防范非法取证的目标。相比而言,采用律师参与侦查的事先预防方式更有效,有利于保障侦查取证行为的合法性。2012年修改后的《刑事诉讼法》明确规定了律师以辩护人的身份介入侦查阶段,但律师在场权在立法上依旧没有得到确立。律师在场权是犯罪嫌疑人的一项重要诉讼权利,是对侦查人员的一种有效监督和制衡,可以在一定程度上平衡控辩双方的力量,防范程序违法,实现程序公正,保证侦查人员取证合法。我国刑事司法环境日趋完善,刑事司法理念更新发展,侦查阶段的辩护制度从立法层面得到确立与保障,律师行业蓬勃发展,相关试验取得的成果显著,都为律师在场权在我国的建立奠定了坚实的基础。全文首先对律师在场权进行概述,界定其涵义和权利主体,介绍律师在场权的历史发展脉络;其次,介绍了域外律师在场权的相关立法规定及实践情况。主要是选取了英美法系和大陆法系中具有代表性的国家和地区,对该权利在不同法系中的权利范围、权利限制、违反该项权利的后果进行横向比较,为我国侦查讯问阶段律师在场权的建立提供借鉴参考;再次,结合我国刑事司法环境的变化,对建立我国侦查讯问阶段律师在场权的必要性和可行性进行多角度的分析论证;最后,对我国律师在场权的具体制度构建提出初步的设想,主要包括适用的案件范围、律师在场的权利内容与界限、适用的具体程序、相关配套措施的完善,以期对未来立法或司法能有一定的启示或帮助。
[Abstract]:To promote the reform of the litigation system centered on trial, we should strengthen the prevention of the source of extorting confessions by torture and illegal gathering of evidence, reduce the illegal behavior in the investigation and interrogation, and promote the fundamental reform of the interrogation system of pretrial investigation.At present, for illegal investigation, mainly through the implementation of illegal evidence exclusion rules for ex post relief.This kind of post-event relief procedure is complicated, the effect is not easy to realize, and it is difficult to achieve the goal of preventing illegal evidence collection.Comparatively speaking, it is more effective to adopt the method of prior prevention of lawyers' participation in investigation, which is conducive to ensuring the legality of investigation and evidence collection. The Criminal procedure Law, which was amended in 2012, clearly stipulates that lawyers will intervene in the investigation stage as a defender.However, the right of lawyers to be present is still not established in legislation.The right of lawyer's presence is an important litigation right of the criminal suspect and an effective supervision and balance to the investigators. It can balance the power of the prosecution and the defense to a certain extent, prevent the violation of the procedure, and realize the procedural justice.To ensure that the investigators are legal in obtaining evidence.China's criminal justice environment is becoming more and more perfect, the concept of criminal justice is updated and developed, the defense system in the investigation stage has been established and guaranteed from the legislative level, the lawyer industry is booming, and the relevant experiments have achieved remarkable results.All of them lay a solid foundation for the establishment of lawyer's right to be present in our country.The full text first summarizes the lawyer's right to be present, defines its meaning and the subject of the right, and introduces the historical development of the right of lawyer's presence. Secondly, it introduces the relevant legislative provisions and practice of the right of lawyers' presence outside the country.It mainly selects the representative countries and regions in the Anglo-American law system and the civil law system to compare the scope of the right in different legal systems, the limitation of the right, and the consequences of violating the right.It provides reference for the establishment of lawyer's right to be present in the investigation and interrogation stage of our country. Thirdly, combined with the change of criminal judicial environment in our country, the author analyzes and demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of establishing the lawyer's presence right in the period of investigation and interrogation in China.Finally, the author puts forward some tentative ideas on the construction of the specific system of lawyers' right to be present in our country, mainly including the scope of applicable cases, the content and limits of lawyers' right to be present, the specific procedures applicable, and the perfection of relevant supporting measures.With a view to future legislation or judicial can have some enlightenment or help.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.5

【相似文献】