论网络民意对司法的监督

发布时间：2018-04-14 21:20

本文选题：网络民意 + 司法　；参考：《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：自2003年的“孙志刚案”起,网络民意开始深刻影响中国司法。此后,每年都有司法案件受到网络民意的关注和监督。从2003年的“刘涌案”到2008年的“许霆案”,再到2011年的“药家鑫案”、“李昌奎案”,直至2012年初还在司法程序中的“吴英案”,无不有网络民意的监督和参与。网络民意关注和监督司法,有利于防止司法腐败、保证司法独立,从而实现司法公正。但是,网络民意因其具有非理性和道德批判性等特点,在监督司法的过程中曾出现破坏司法权威、消解司法信仰的现象。本文从网络民意的基本概念出发,探讨了网络民意监督司法的正当性、过程和效果,深入分析了网络民意对司法的双面影响。为了进一步理解网络民意监督司法中存在的矛盾,本文对网络民意与司法的冲突与契合关系做了详细阐述,同时为构建网络民意与司法的互动机制做了铺垫。本文在最后一部分构想了网络民意与司法的应然关系,并对我国网络民意与司法的互动制度进行了梳理和评析。鉴于我国现有制度的缺陷,本文对美国经验进行借鉴,并尝试构建我国的“法庭之友”制度,以期解决网络民意监督司法中存在的问题。
[Abstract]:Since 2003 "Sun Zhigang case", the network public opinion began to profoundly influence the Chinese judicature.Since then, every year there are judicial cases by the network of public concern and supervision.From "Liu Yong case" in 2003 to "Xu Ting case" in 2008, to "Yao Jiaxin case", "Li Changkui case" in 2011, to "Wu Ying case", which is still in judicial process in early 2012, all of them have the supervision and participation of network public opinion.The network public opinion pays attention to and supervises the judicature, which helps to prevent the judicial corruption and guarantee the judicial independence so as to realize the judicial justice.However, because of its irrationality and moral criticism, network public opinion has appeared the phenomenon of destroying judicial authority and dispelling judicial belief in the process of supervising judicature.Based on the basic concept of network public opinion, this paper discusses the legitimacy, process and effect of network public opinion supervision, and analyzes the dual influence of network public opinion on justice.In order to further understand the contradictions in the judicial supervision of network public opinion, this paper makes a detailed description of the relationship between network public opinion and judicial conflict and coincidence, and lays the groundwork for the construction of the interactive mechanism of network public opinion and judicature.In the last part, the author conceive the relationship between network public opinion and judicature, and analyze the interactive system of network public opinion and judicature in our country.In view of the defects of the existing system in our country, this paper draws lessons from the experience of the United States and tries to construct the amicus curiae system in order to solve the problems existing in the supervision of public opinion on the Internet.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926;G206

【参考文献】