当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

公共政策的司法考量

发布时间:2018-04-25 07:11

  本文选题:公共政策 + 司法 ; 参考:《中南民族大学》2011年硕士论文


【摘要】:公共政策是政府等社会公共权威为实现社会目标、解决社会问题而制定的公共行动计划、方案和准则。公共政策与司法的关系尤为密切,其作为非正式法律渊源,有别于民主程序生成的立法这样的正式法律渊源,在司法面临立法空白和疏漏时,可发挥法律适用上的能动弥补功能。公共政策在应然意义上仍以正义为其根本,但在现实中也存在自身的妥当性问题,其过度扩张将会对民众私权构成威胁,因此,有必要对我国公共政策与法律的相互关系进行合理定位,防止公共政策冲击和削弱法律的权威,防止法律的功能被公共政策所扭曲或取代,在司法活动中既要能动适用又须谨慎克制。 公共政策介入司法是现代社会广泛存在的现象。尤其在一个后发的以政府推动为主的急剧现代化的社会背景下,这一现象显得更加突出和复杂。从理论上研究、解释和把握这一现象,是法制现代化研究中的一个重要课题。这对于我们正确认识公共政策与法律的关系,正确认识它们对于社会的基本价值,有着重要的理论意义;对于我们正确处理司法中所涉及的公共政策问题,使司法裁判与社会发展更加契合,更是有着重要的实践意义。 本文针对上述问题从以下四个部分展开论述: 第一章针对公共政策进行系统分析。该部分首先从政策学和法理学的角度对公共政策的概念进行界定,然后分析了公共政策的特征、公共政策的类型以及公共政策的功能,目的是为公共政策的司法适用提供理论依据,有利于研究公共政策在司法中的地位和作用。 第二章围绕公共政策与司法的关系展开。该部分介绍了公共政策与法律的社会互动,探讨公共政策与作为正式法律渊源的法律之间的联系,公共政策作为司法裁判依据对司法的影响,同时又要和法律相区别,在司法适用的过程中加以必要的限制。 第三章探讨作为一种特殊法源的公共政策。该部分分析了公共政策,一种非正式法律渊源,作为司法裁判依据的必要性和应然性。并从国内和国外相比较的角度,研究公共政策在司法裁判过程中的运用。 第四章探讨公共政策司法适用的基本理念和机制。该部分在前文论述的基础上,较为深入地思考和分析了贯穿公共政策司法适用始终的观念、原则和机制。针对公共政策的司法适用加以规范和限制,对我国公共政策与法律的相互关系进行合理定位,使司法裁判与社会发展更加契合。
[Abstract]:Public policy is a kind of public action plan, program and guideline that the government and other public authority draw up to realize the social goal and solve the social problem. The relationship between public policy and justice is particularly close. As an informal source of law, public policy is different from the formal source of law such as legislation generated by democratic procedures, when the judiciary is faced with legislative gaps and omissions. It can bring into play the function of active compensation in the application of law. Public policy is still based on justice in the sense of necessity, but it also has its own appropriateness problem in reality. Its excessive expansion will pose a threat to the private rights of the public. It is necessary to rationally position the relationship between public policy and law in our country, prevent public policy from attacking and weakening the authority of law, and prevent the function of law from being distorted or replaced by public policy. In judicial activities, both active application and restraint must be exercised. Public policy intervention in the administration of justice is a widespread phenomenon in modern society. Especially under the background of a modern society which is driven by government, this phenomenon is more prominent and complicated. It is an important subject in the study of legal modernization to study, explain and grasp this phenomenon theoretically. This is of great theoretical significance for us to correctly understand the relationship between public policy and law, to correctly understand their fundamental value to society, and to correctly handle the public policy issues involved in the administration of justice. It is of great practical significance to make the administration of justice more compatible with the development of society. This paper discusses the above problems from the following four parts: The first chapter is the systematic analysis of public policy. This part defines the concept of public policy from the perspective of policy and jurisprudence, and then analyzes the characteristics of public policy, the types of public policy and the function of public policy. The purpose is to provide the theoretical basis for the judicial application of public policy, and to study the position and function of public policy in the administration of justice. The second chapter focuses on the relationship between public policy and justice. This part introduces the social interaction between public policy and law, discusses the relationship between public policy and law as a formal source of law, the influence of public policy on justice as the basis of judicial decision, and at the same time, it distinguishes itself from the law. Impose the necessary restrictions in the course of judicial application. The third chapter discusses the public policy as a special source of law. This part analyzes the necessity and necessity of public policy, an informal source of law. The application of public policy in the process of administration of justice is studied from the point of view of comparison between domestic and foreign countries. Chapter four discusses the basic concept and mechanism of judicial application of public policy. On the basis of the previous discussion, this part deeply considers and analyzes the concepts, principles and mechanisms that run through the judicial application of public policy. The judicial application of public policy should be regulated and restricted, and the relationship between public policy and law in our country should be rationally positioned so as to make the administration of justice more compatible with the development of society.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D630;D926

【引证文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 孙见;网络舆论与我国公共政策制定的关系研究[D];安徽大学;2012年



本文编号:1800299

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1800299.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f02d5***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com