当代中国司法进程中的革命思维研究

发布时间：2018-04-25 19:46

本文选题：革命 + 革命思维　；参考：《华侨大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国是通过革命斗争方式夺取政权的国家,具有长期的革命传统,革命思维曾经占据主流的思想地位,在建国以后革命思维还发挥着重要的作用,这深刻影响了我国司法工作方式。在司法场域中,革命思维与法治思维已经是完全不同的两个思维途径。革命思维暴露出了中国司法过程中的诸多非理性,包括理念的和制度的。而司法过程又必须贯彻法治思维所固有的规则性及其内在逻辑。鉴于革命思维正面临的理论困境,本文对革命思维在司法发展过程中的影响进行系统的研究。本文主要以四个部分来论述:一、是革命思维的概述。从历史背景出发,着重分析了当代我国革命思维的理论渊源,主要是四个理论渊源:三民主义、马列主义学说、毛泽东思想、邓小平理论。试图在连贯的历史中找到这些理论的承接之处,以便理清革命思维形成的脉络。再通过对革命思维的进行较全面的特征分析,希望能够合理解释司法领域中革命思维存在的现象。二、革命思维中的中国司法。这部分主要探究革命思维影响之下中国司法会呈现出怎样的风格。以历史先后顺序对司法适用的法律进行梳理,找出存在革命思维的法律依据、并探讨了革命思维可能导致几种司法实践活动。三、革命思维引发的司法悲剧——以冤案为视点。这个部分是本文论证的特色之处,试图发现当今革命思维与冤案的发生存在的必然联系,将时间定格在特定的严打时期进行考察,以几个比较典型的冤案进行比较彻底的分析。从一些学者已有分析冤案的原因基础上,从他们分析出立法技术原因层面或司法经验原因背后梳理出更为深层次的冤案发生的思维根源,以期能够找到冤案发生的历史的思维逻辑。最后在思维转变上遏制冤案的发生。四、根据十八大确立的法治思维,探究革命思维与法治思维之间可能存在的冲突,并梳理了司法法治思维经历的曲折过程,最后总结出革命思维让位于法治思维的三个途径,从宪法思维、人权思维、法律修辞三个方面确立法治思维。
[Abstract]:China is a country that seized political power through revolutionary struggle, has a long revolutionary tradition, revolutionary thinking once occupied the mainstream ideological status, and has played an important role in revolutionary thinking since the founding of the people's Republic of China. This has deeply affected our country judicial work way. In the judicial field, revolutionary thinking and rule of law thinking are two completely different ways of thinking. Revolutionary thinking exposes a lot of irrationality in China's judicial process, including idealistic and institutional. And the judicial process must carry out the inherent rule of law thinking and its internal logic. In view of the theoretical dilemma that revolutionary thinking is facing, this paper makes a systematic study on the influence of revolutionary thinking in the process of judicial development. This paper is mainly discussed in four parts: first, the summary of revolutionary thinking. Based on the historical background, this paper emphatically analyzes the theoretical origin of the revolutionary thinking in contemporary China, mainly from four theoretical sources: the three people's principles, the Marxism-Leninism theory, Mao Zedong's thought and Deng Xiaoping's theory. This paper tries to find the continuity of these theories in a coherent history in order to clarify the formation of revolutionary thinking. By analyzing the characteristics of revolutionary thinking, the author hopes to explain the phenomenon of revolutionary thinking in the judicial field. Second, Chinese judicature in revolutionary thinking. This part mainly probes into the style of Chinese judicature under the influence of revolutionary thinking. This paper combs the law of judicial application in the order of history, finds out the legal basis for the existence of revolutionary thinking, and probes into the possibility that revolutionary thinking may lead to several kinds of judicial practice activities. Third, the judicial tragedy caused by revolutionary thinking-from the point of view of injustice. This part is the characteristic of this article, trying to find out the inevitable connection between the revolutionary thinking and the existence of the injustice case, and to investigate the time frame in the specific severe attack period, and to make a more thorough analysis with several more typical injustice cases. On the basis of some scholars' analysis of the causes of grievance, from their analysis of the legislative technical reasons or judicial experience behind the reasons to sort out a deeper level of injustice occurred thinking root. With a view to finding the historical logic of injustice. Finally, in the transformation of thinking to contain the occurrence of injustice. Fourthly, according to the rule of law thinking established by the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, this paper probes into the possible conflict between the revolutionary thinking and the rule of law thinking, combs the tortuous process of the judicial thinking on the rule of law, and finally sums up three ways for the revolutionary thinking to give way to the rule of law thinking. From three aspects of constitutional thinking, human rights thinking, legal rhetoric to establish the rule of law thinking.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】