浅析新闻舆论监督与司法独立的对立和统一

发布时间：2018-05-01 12:13

本文选题：新闻舆论监督 + 司法独立　；参考：《中南民族大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：近些年来，随着新闻媒体的快速发展，新闻论监督在遏制司法腐败，维护社会公平正义方面发挥着重要作用。有些时候，新闻舆论监督司法过程中发生了一些冲突和摩擦。主要表现在新闻监督司法独立的侵蚀和司法机关对新闻媒体限制两方面。新闻舆论监督与司法独立各有其正当性基础。新闻舆论监督实际上是宪法的言论自由和批评建议权的延伸，司法独立则是一项基本法则原则。媒体与法院在案件中所持立场、公正标准和运行规律的差异导致了两者评价结论的差异，这是媒体监督与司法独立对立的根源，以及我国在处理媒体与司法关系时还存在一些偏差。新闻舆论监督与司法独立之间的对立是可以调和的，二者在宪政意义上是统一的。统一新闻舆论监督与司法独立的对立有利于维护司法的权威促进司法公正，实现二者各自的价值。本文对我国现实情况进行剖析，深层次地挖掘两者之间产生冲突的原因。在协调二者关系上，笔者以促进司法公正为契合点，对媒体监督的原则、媒体角色的定位、媒体与司法彼此间的宽容和自律等方面提出建议。第一部分，，新闻舆论监督与司法独立的基本理论，主要论述了新闻舆论监督的概念、作用、特征，司法独立的概念、特征、意义。第二部分，新闻舆论监督与司法独立对立的现状，通过列举五个媒体审判的干扰司法的热点案件论述新闻舆论监督对司法独立的侵蚀，同时论述了我国地方机关、地方权力机关，出台各种措施限制新闻媒体的报道。第三部分，新闻舆论监督与司法独立对立的原因，论述了理论上存在的原因及实践中存在的原因。第四部分，国外处理新闻舆论监督与司法独立的经验，主要论述了美国、英国等英美法系和德国、法国等大陆法系国家的做法。第五部分，协调新闻舆论监督与司法独立关系的法律对策，笔者从以下三个方面给出法律对策：第一，建立司法机关对新闻媒体不当干涉的抵御机制，增强司法机关自身的独立性；第二，建立新闻媒体的约束机制，限定新闻舆论监督司法的界限；第三，建立新闻舆论监督与司法独立的协调机制，实现新闻媒体与司法的良性互动。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of news media, journalistic supervision plays an important role in containing judicial corruption and safeguarding social fairness and justice. Sometimes, some conflicts and frictions occur in the judicial process of media supervision. It is mainly reflected in the erosion of the judicial independence of the news supervision and the restriction of the news media by the judicial organs. Media supervision and judicial independence have their own legitimate basis. In fact, media supervision is the extension of constitutional freedom of speech and right of criticism and suggestion, and judicial independence is a basic principle. The difference between the media and the court in the position, the standard of justice and the law of operation leads to the difference of the evaluation conclusion, which is the root of the opposition between the media supervision and the judicial independence. And there are still some deviations in dealing with the relationship between the media and the judiciary in our country. The opposition between media supervision and judicial independence can be reconciled, and they are unified in the sense of constitutionalism. Unifying the opposition between media supervision and judicial independence is conducive to safeguarding judicial authority and promoting judicial justice and realizing their respective values. This paper analyzes the reality of our country, and deeply excavates the causes of the conflict between the two. The author puts forward some suggestions on the principles of media supervision, the orientation of media role, the tolerance and self-discipline between the media and the judiciary. The first part, the basic theory of news public opinion supervision and judicial independence, mainly discusses the concept, function, characteristics, concept, characteristics and significance of news public opinion supervision. The second part, the current situation of the opposition between the news public opinion supervision and the judicial independence, discusses the erosion of the judicial independence by the news public opinion supervision through enumerating five hot cases that interfere with the judicature, and at the same time discusses the local organs in our country. Local authorities have introduced various measures to limit the coverage of the news media. The third part discusses the reasons of the opposition between the supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary. The fourth part, the experience of dealing with the supervision of public opinion and judicial independence abroad, mainly discusses the practices of the United States, the United Kingdom and other common law countries, Germany, France and other civil law countries. The fifth part, the coordination of the relationship between public opinion supervision and judicial independence of the legal countermeasures, the author from the following three aspects of the legal countermeasures: first, the establishment of judicial organs to the news media improper interference in the defense mechanism, To strengthen the independence of the judiciary itself; second, to establish a restrictive mechanism for the news media to limit the limits of the supervision of the judiciary by public opinion; third, to establish a coordination mechanism between the supervision of public opinion and the independence of the judiciary. To realize the positive interaction between the news media and the judiciary.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926;G206

【参考文献】