当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

论司法拍卖中买受人救济制度完善

发布时间:2018-05-02 20:15

  本文选题:买受人 + 救济制度 ; 参考:《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:伴随着司法拍卖不断的改革发展,司法拍卖在民事强制执行中所占的比重日益加大。当前,我国对于民事强制执行方面救济的立法更多的侧重于对被执行人或案外第三人,但对于买受人救济的相关立法尚待完善,因此为了进一步深化对司法拍卖的改革,有必要同时加强对于买受人救济制度的关注,并对其进行完善。本文分为引言、正文和结束语三个部分。正文主要从四个方面展开:第一章:分析买受人救济制度的必要性,买受人面临权益被侵害,但无法从现有制度中获得有效救济困境,反映当前我国对于买受人救济制度存在的缺陷。同时,罗列当前我国司法拍卖制度中,影响买受人救济的主要问题。第二章:司法拍卖相关问题存在争议的关键点在于,司法拍卖性质的界定存在不同观点,因此,在完善买受人救济之前需要明确司法拍卖的性质。买受人在不同模式的司法拍卖下,买受人的法律地位存在差异,与各主体之间的法律关系发生变化,所以需要明确买受人在不同拍卖模式下的地位。第三章:司法拍卖包含较多的主体,且各主体之间因拍卖模式不同,扮演不同角色。面对复杂的主体关系,需要理清各主体之间的关系,明确其在司法拍卖中所处的地位,为买受人救济制度的完善提供依据。司法拍卖的救济制度主要集中在案外第三人和申请执行人,那么对于买受人救济制度的制定需要衡量买受人与上述两者之间的利益,进行取舍。第四章:罗列分析得出买受人救济可行的方式,并对上文所提及的问题进行有针对性的解决,同时对救济制度根据司法拍卖的特性进行适当的调整,使其更适合司法拍卖的要求。
[Abstract]:With the reform and development of judicial auction, the proportion of judicial auction in civil enforcement is increasing. At present, the legislation of relief for civil enforcement in our country is more focused on the person executed or the third person outside the case, but the relevant legislation on the remedy of the buyer is still to be perfected, so in order to further deepen the reform of the judicial auction, It is necessary to strengthen the buyer relief system and improve it. This article is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is mainly from four aspects: the first chapter: analysis of the necessity of the buyer relief system, buyers are faced with rights and interests are infringed, but not from the existing system to obtain effective relief dilemma, It reflects the defects of the buyer relief system in our country at present. At the same time, it lists the main problems that affect the buyer's remedy in the current judicial auction system of our country. Chapter two: the key point of the disputes about the judicial auction is that there are different views on the definition of the nature of the judicial auction, so it is necessary to clarify the nature of the judicial auction before perfecting the buyer's remedy. Under different models of judicial auction, the buyer's legal status is different, and the legal relationship between buyer and each subject changes, so it is necessary to clarify the buyer's position in different auction modes. Chapter three: judicial auction contains more subjects, and each subject plays different roles because of different auction modes. In the face of complex subject relationship, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between the subjects, clarify their position in the judicial auction, and provide the basis for the perfection of the buyer's relief system. The relief system of judicial auction mainly focuses on the third party outside the case and the application executor, so the establishment of the buyer relief system needs to weigh the interests between the buyer and the above two, and make a choice. Chapter IV: list the available ways of buyer relief, and solve the problems mentioned above, at the same time, adjust the relief system according to the characteristics of judicial auction. Make it more suitable for the requirements of judicial auction.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨秀清;;以利益衡量为基础构建民事执行拍卖效力制度[J];法学杂志;2014年08期

2 徐舟;;推行司法网拍 提升司法公信——从法的价值角度证成网络司法拍卖合理性[J];法制与社会;2013年28期

3 乔宇;;强制拍卖中买受人的权利保护 以法院错误拍卖第三人财产为视角[J];法律适用;2011年03期

4 南子;;做好司法委托拍卖任重道远[J];中国拍卖;2009年07期

5 ;用制度保证公平 以程序保证规范——上海司法委托拍卖模式的成功之处[J];中国拍卖;2009年06期

6 范向阳;范欣珂;;试论强制拍卖无效[J];人民司法;2009年07期

7 连品方;陈贤贵;;拍定人与第三人利益平衡机制之构建[J];河北科技大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期

8 ;观点:司法拍卖 由乱而治[J];中国拍卖;2007年07期

9 王洪亮;物上瑕疵担保责任、履行障碍法与缔约过失责任[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年04期

10 杨红朝;论我国执行救济制度的缺陷与完善[J];郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版);2005年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 马剑;;实现审判服务经济社会发展的新常态[N];人民法院报;2015年

2 肖光华;陈治美;;对不动产执行设立强制管理措施的探讨[N];人民法院报;2007年



本文编号:1835326

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1835326.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f21c8***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com