数字化和传统背景中的裁判文书公开机制
发布时间:2018-05-03 02:11
本文选题:裁判文书公开 + 裁判文书上网 ; 参考:《法学》2013年08期
【摘要】:将司法文件借助最新信息技术昭然于民众,是中国法制建设进程中司法公开的一项瞩目的成就。本文基于对我国网络裁判文书库的观察,并将之与德国司法判决及台湾地区司法判决网络公布的实践进行比较和研究,试图描述我国已建裁判文书库中有效获取性的缺失,以及与其所承担的巨大期望之间的距离,进而探讨裁判文书库建设的重要方向,即以其有效获取性为驱动。同时,本文还检讨裁判文书传统发布机制中的重要缺陷,以及解决该根本性问题的紧迫性。笔者主张,裁判文书的网络和传统公布并行改进和发展乃是实现司法公开理想的长期工程。
[Abstract]:It is a remarkable achievement of judicial openness in the process of legal construction in China to show the judicial documents to the public with the help of the latest information technology. This paper, based on the observation of our country's online adjudicative document library, compares it with the practice of judicial decision in Germany and the publication of judicial judgment network in Taiwan, and attempts to describe the lack of effective acquirement in the established judicial document library in our country. And the distance between it and its huge expectation, and then discusses the important direction of the construction of the referee document library, that is, driven by its effective acquirement. At the same time, this paper also reviews the important defects in the traditional mechanism of issuing adjudicative documents and the urgency of solving this fundamental problem. The author argues that the concurrent improvement and development of the network and traditional publication of judicial documents is a long-term project to realize the ideal of judicial publicity.
【作者单位】: 纽约大学法学院图书馆;清华大学法学院图书馆;
【分类号】:D926.13
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张明丽;;关于民事诉讼公开宣判制度的改革建议[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2010年03期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
,本文编号:1836501
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1836501.html

