同案不同判问题探讨

发布时间：2018-05-03 14:17

本文选题：同案不同判 + 司法公正　；参考：《河北大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国在很多案件中经常出现“同案不同判”现象,这是司法行为不规范的突出表现。这个现象形成的原因是复杂的。笔者从几个典型的案例入手,引出同案不同判现象确实存在,而且有愈演愈烈的势头。这种同案不同判的危害结果造成老百姓对于司法权威的漠视,和对法律神圣不可侵犯的精神的不信任。通过分析出现同案不同判的现象的主要原因,根据自己对于法律的理解,提出一些浅显的观点,希望能对司法的改革,做出自己的一点儿贡献。本文采取总分结构,逐一展开论述,从而归纳出自己的观点。我知道自己的水平不高,但是我在不断思考中,通过阅读文献,查阅资料,提出个人一些不成熟的理论,希望能对解决同案不同判现象,有所抑制,为司法的不断发展提供自己的微薄之力。本文通过三个部分对同案不同判问题展开论述。其中第一部分,概述同案不同判,通过几个典型案例来说明同案不同判的现象及其同案不同判的危害表现,对于社会主义法治发展是个巨大的破坏。第二部分,分析同案不同判的现状及其存在的问题。第三部分,同案同判可以实现,分别从我国对于法律的追求;案件的特别属性可以适用同案同判的效果;此外,根据法律的确定性规定,在特定地区针对某一类型按键,可以实现同案同判的结果。第四部分,提出关于解决同案不同判的对策,通过不断实践,反复总结,从而抑制同案不同判的现象再次发生。希望自己的倡导和对法律实践的粗浅认识,为法制改革完善提供思路。同案不同判的话题,一直是法学界长期讨论的命题。之所以受到关注,说明同案不同判现象确实存在,而且是目前法治社会的一块毒瘤,在现代快捷网络社会,充满了对其的各种评论。同案不同判现象的存在,有它深刻的社会原因,经过30年中国法治建设的极大发展,人们的法制观念与日俱增,随着个人博客的盛行,信息流通更加迅速。真正媒体的自由报道,将这一社会诟病暴露的一览无余。这更需要广大法律工作者,集思广益,不断改革提出有效的措施,结合当地的风俗习惯,制定符合当地经济发展状况和生活实际情况的方法,从而有效的避免同案不同判案件再次发生。
[Abstract]:In many cases, there are often "different cases of the same case" phenomenon, which is the outstanding manifestation of the unfair judicial behavior. The cause of the formation of this phenomenon is complicated. From several typical cases, the author leads to the existence of the different cases of the same case and the growing momentum. The result of the different judgments of the same case is caused by the result. The people's disregard for the judicial authority and the distrust of the spirit of the inviolability of the law. Through the analysis of the main reasons for the phenomenon of the different judgments in the same case, and according to their own understanding of the law, some superficial views are put forward in the hope of making a little contribution to the reform of the judiciary. I know my own point of view, and I know my level is not high, but in my continuous thinking, through reading literature, consulting information, putting forward some personal immature theories, I hope to solve the different cases of the same case, restrain, and provide their own meager power for the continuous development of the judicature.
This article discusses the different judgments of the same case through three parts. In the first part, it outlines the different judgments of the same case, and through several typical cases to illustrate the phenomenon of the different judgments of the same case and the manifestations of the harm of the different judgments in the same case. The second part is a great damage to the development of the socialist rule of law. The third part, the same case with the same case can be realized, respectively from the pursuit of the law in our country; the special attribute of the case can apply the same case and the effect of the same sentence; in addition, according to the legal certainty, in specific areas for a certain type of key, the same case can be found in the same case. The fourth part, put forward about the solution of the same case is not. The Countermeasures of the same sentence, through continuous practice and repeated summary, thus inhibit the recurrence of the different cases of the same case. I hope that our own advocacy and the shallow understanding of the legal practice will provide some ideas for the reform and improvement of the legal system.
The topic of the same case has been a topic for a long discussion in the law circle. It has been paid attention to the existence of the different phenomena of the same case, and it is a malignant tumor of the rule of law society at present. In the modern fast network society, it is full of various comments on it. The existence of different judgments in the same case has its profound social reasons, after 30 years. With the development of the rule of law in China, the concept of legal system is increasing. With the prevalence of personal blogs, the circulation of information is more rapid. The free report of the real media has a clear view of the social criticism. It is customary to formulate methods that conform to the local economic development and the actual situation of life, so as to effectively avoid the recurrence of different cases in the same case.

【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【引证文献】