当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

知识产权审判机构优化研究

发布时间:2018-05-14 13:46

  本文选题:知识产权审判机构 + 知识产权法庭 ; 参考:《华中科技大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:知识经济在21世纪迅猛发展,知识产权作为促进经济发展,激励科技创新的核心引擎,越来越为各方所重视。知识产权保护制度已经成为世界各个国家和地区不可或缺的制度。近年来我国涉及知识产权的诉讼案件数量持续快速增长。总的来说,我国的知识产权司法保护制度有了一定发展,但相比世界发达国家和地区,仍处于初始阶段。构建完善的知识产权保护制度对促进科技进步和经济发展具有重要的作用。现在一些国家在国内和国际上加大知识产权保护力度、强化知识产权战略地位,其基本目的亦不外乎希求以知识产权为武器,实现和维护本国在国际市场的竞争优势和技术优势。作为知识产权司法保护中的重要部分,知识产权审判机构是审理知识产权案件的司法机构,包括相关的司法资源设置。知识产权审判机构的优化,关系着本国知识产权的保护范围、保护水平以及保护机制,更是影响到知识产权的发展,科技水平的进步,甚至综合国力的强盛。 我国的知识产权司法保护制度一直处于完善和发展过程中。知识产权审判机构仍然存在着一些问题,如知识产权审判机构设置不规范,知识产权案件审判队伍的规范化程度不高。我国一直在实施知识产权战略,目前进入了深化实施阶段,要充分完善知识产权审判机制,将司法解释和司法政策进一步充实完善,更好地实行司法保护,这都对知识产权审判机构的设置和优化提出了更高的要求。 知识产权审判机构作为保护知识产权的审判机构,其根本目的是为了合法高效的审理知识产权案件,维护知识成果,促进科技创新,打击知识产权违法行为,保护当事人的合法权益,维护知识经济的良好发展环境。本文从两个层面着眼,一是从我国历史发展角度对知识产权审判机构进行了概述,另外一方面,对世界先进国家和地区的知识产权审判机构进行比较分析,借鉴了发达国家知识产权保护制度的先进经验。同时,分析了我国当前知识产权审判制度现状和我国目前知识产权审判制度依然存在各种问题。本文最后借鉴了国外的先进制度,结合现实基础沿用了国内建立知识产权法院的构想,提出知识产权审判机构的具体优化措施为,建立知识法庭,提高识产权审判队伍综合素质,完善人民陪审员制度,,引入技术审查官等有效措施。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of knowledge economy in the 21st century, intellectual property rights, as the core engine to promote economic development and stimulate scientific and technological innovation, have attracted more and more attention. Intellectual property protection system has become an indispensable system in all countries and regions of the world. In recent years, the number of litigation cases involving intellectual property rights in China has been increasing rapidly. Generally speaking, the judicial protection system of intellectual property in China has developed to some extent, but it is still in its initial stage compared with developed countries and regions in the world. The establishment of a sound intellectual property protection system plays an important role in promoting scientific and technological progress and economic development. At present, some countries have stepped up the protection of intellectual property rights at home and abroad and strengthened the strategic position of intellectual property rights. Their basic purpose is also to seek intellectual property rights as a weapon. To realize and maintain the competitive and technical advantages of our country in the international market. As an important part of the judicial protection of intellectual property, the intellectual property judicial institution is the judicial institution that hears intellectual property cases, including the relevant judicial resources. The optimization of intellectual property judicial institutions is related to the scope, level and mechanism of intellectual property protection in our country. It also affects the development of intellectual property rights, the progress of science and technology, and even the strength of comprehensive national strength. Our country's intellectual property right judicial protection system has been in the perfect and the development process. There are still some problems in the intellectual property judicial organization, such as the non-standard setting of the intellectual property trial institution and the low standardization degree of the intellectual property trial team. Our country has been implementing the strategy of intellectual property. At present, we have entered the stage of deepening the implementation. We should fully improve the mechanism of intellectual property trial, further enrich and perfect the judicial interpretation and judicial policy, and better implement judicial protection. This has put forward higher requirements for the setting and optimization of intellectual property judicial institutions. The fundamental purpose of the intellectual property judicial organ as a judicial organ for the protection of intellectual property rights is to deal with intellectual property cases legally and efficiently, to safeguard the achievements of knowledge, to promote scientific and technological innovation, and to crack down on illegal acts of intellectual property, Protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and maintain a good environment for the development of knowledge economy. This paper focuses on two aspects. One is an overview of intellectual property judicial institutions from the perspective of China's historical development, and the other is a comparative analysis of intellectual property judicial institutions in advanced countries and regions in the world. It draws lessons from the advanced experience of intellectual property protection system in developed countries. At the same time, it analyzes the current situation of intellectual property trial system in China and the existing problems in our current intellectual property trial system. In the end, this paper draws lessons from the advanced systems of foreign countries, adopts the conception of establishing intellectual property courts in China in combination with the practical basis, and puts forward the specific optimization measures for intellectual property judicial institutions: establishing knowledge courts. To improve the comprehensive quality of the judge team of property rights, to perfect the system of people's jurors and to introduce technical examiners and other effective measures.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 梅术文;曹新明;;日本知识产权法院的设置及其启示[J];电子知识产权;2005年12期

2 徐家力;;我国知识产权司法保护目前存在的问题及对策[J];法律适用;2006年03期

3 陈惠珍;徐俊;;论我国知识产权立体审判模式的构建[J];法律适用;2006年04期

4 孙海龙;董倚铭;;知识产权审判中的民刑冲突及其解决 以构建协调的诉讼程序和专业审判组织为目标[J];法律适用;2008年03期

5 张玉敏;;知识产权法制三十年[J];法学杂志;2009年02期

6 郭寿康;李剑;;我国知识产权审判组织专门化问题研究——以德国联邦专利法院为视角[J];法学家;2008年03期

7 张德淼,周佑勇;论当前我国实现司法正义的条件和途径[J];法学评论;1999年01期

8 邱文宽;加强知识产权审判应优先解决的几个问题[J];广东科技;1999年05期

9 雷蒙德·尼柯尔;李艺;郑厚俊;;澳大利亚知识产权简介及对高校知识产权的影响[J];法制与社会;2010年19期

10 钟莉;刘建新;王俊毅;;知识产权司法保护与行政执法衔接策略研究——兼论知识产权“三审合一”审判机制[J];科技与法律;2009年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 曹三明 陈海光;[N];人民法院报;2001年



本文编号:1888087

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1888087.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户95b4a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com