民事诉讼调解结案率实证研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 19:06

  本文选题：法院调解 + 调解结案率　； 参考：《法学研究》2012年01期

【摘要】：实证研究发现,近年来无论一审、二审还是再审调解结案率都呈现曲折增长而非持续增长态势。无论一审、二审还是再审抑或婚姻家庭类案件、合同类案件还是权属侵权类案件,调解结案率一般都未超过60%。而且总体上看,一审调解结案率高于二审和再审,再审调解结案率高于二审,婚姻家庭类案件调解结案率高于合同类案件,合同类案件高于权属侵权类案件。当下中国法院调解结案率呈现如此面相,既是调解政策驱动、各法院领导重视程度不同所致,也有个案差异、案件性质不同等原因。这种"运动性"调解的负面效应在司法实践中越发凸显,未来中国应在深刻反思基础上理性对待和设计法院调解制度。
[Abstract]:The empirical study found that in recent years, the settlement rate of mediation in first instance, second instance or retrial has been increasing zigzag rather than continuously. No matter first instance, second trial or retrial or marriage and family cases, contract cases or tort cases, mediation cases are generally not more than 60. On the whole, the settlement rate of first instance mediation is higher than that of second instance and retrial, and that of retrial mediation is higher than that of second instance, that of marriage and family cases is higher than that of contract cases, and that of contract cases is higher than that of rights infringement cases. At present, the court mediation settlement rate in China presents such a face, is driven by mediation policy, the court leaders pay attention to different degrees, but also different cases, the nature of the case is not the same reason. The negative effect of this kind of "sport" mediation is more and more prominent in the judicial practice. In the future, China should treat and design the court mediation system rationally on the basis of profound reflection.
【作者单位】： 郑州大学法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社科基金项目“民事诉讼政策”(批准号:08BFX060) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(批准号:NCET-10-0123)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D926.2
，

本文编号：1915873