论能动司法的内涵与实现

发布时间：2018-05-21 07:45

本文选题：能动司法 + 司法能动主义　；参考：《中共中央党校》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国的司法制度一直在艰难与曲折中不断前进，重新审视建国以来我国司法制度的发展历程，会发现我国司法模式大致遵循了“由能动到被动，再由被动到能动”的进程。 2009年8月，最高人民法院院长王胜俊到江苏的南京、无锡等地调研时明确提出了“能动司法”的理念，理论界、实务界积极响应，“能动司法”自此成为理论探讨与实践探索的热点。但是在目前的研究和探索中，存在“能动司法”内涵的界定不准确、能动司法的特征不清晰、能动司法的实现路径不明确等问题。本文试图厘清能动司法与司法能动主义的概念，在此基础上界定能动司法的内涵与特征，提出能动司法的实现路径。首先，本文简略论述了能动司法提出的时代背景，从能动司法与司法能动主义的比较分析入手，分析二者的相同点和不同点，对二者的关系进行一个系统的梳理，并在此基础上尝试界定能动司法的内涵，揭示能动司法自身具有的特征。其次，论述了能动司法的正当性。分别从理论依据、历史渊源和现实需要三个方面进行论述。对能动司法的理论依据、中国古代法律传统的历史渊源、近代能动司法实践渊源和当前社会发展对能动司法的需要进行了归纳和梳理。再次，对能动司法的实践进行了梳理与评析。最后，，提出了能动司法的实现路径。分为提高能动司法工作能力、完善能动司法工作制度、建构能动司法运作系统三个层次。本文旨在对能动司法的实践起到一定的理论指导作用，从而实现司法权对国家政治发展和法治建设的能动促进作用。
[Abstract]:The judicial system of our country has been constantly advancing in difficulties and twists and turns to reexamine the course of the development of our judicial system since the founding of the people's Republic of China. It will be found that the judicial mode of our country follows the process of "from active to passive, then from passive to active".
In August 2009, Wang Shengjun, the president of the Supreme People's court, made a clear idea of "active judicature" in Jiangsu, Nanjing, Wuxi and other places. The theoretical circles, the practical circles responded positively. "Active justice" has become the hot spot of theoretical exploration and practice exploration. But in the present research and exploration, there is the connotation of "active justice". This article tries to clarify the concept of active judicature and judicial activism, and defines the connotation and characteristics of active judicature on this basis, and puts forward the realization path of active judicature.
First of all, this paper briefly discusses the background of active judicature, starting with the comparative analysis of active judicature and judicial activism, analyses the similarities and differences between the two, and makes a systematic review of the relationship between the two, and tries to define the connotation of the active judiciary on this basis, and reveals the characteristics of the active judiciary. At the same time, the legitimacy of active justice is discussed in three aspects: theoretical basis, historical origin and practical needs. The theoretical basis of active justice, the historical origin of ancient Chinese legal tradition, the origin of modern active judicial practice and the need of the current social development to the law of the activism. The practice of judicature is combed and evaluated. Finally, the realization path of active judicature is put forward. It is divided into three levels: improving the ability of active judicial work, perfecting the system of active judicial work and constructing the active judicial operation system. This article aims to play a certain theoretical and guiding role in the practice of active judicature so as to realize the judicial power to the State Administration. The active promotion of the development of the rule of law and the construction of the rule of law.
【学位授予单位】：中共中央党校
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【引证文献】