从效力到效率:案例指导制度研究进路反思

发布时间：2018-05-22 08:42

本文选题：判例制度 + 案例指导制度　；参考：《东方法学》2015年05期

【摘要】：司法位于处理最新法律问题的一线,判例制度下的法官通过判例弥补制定法的滞后,在解决社会纠纷的同时形成新的规则,进而促进社会效率的最大化。案例指导制度的建立在一定程度上也分享了这样的价值追求:适应社会变动的需要、同案同判、统一司法适用等都有这种效率追求在里面统一司法适用等都有这种效率追求的价值。但是案例指导制度建立起来之后,在司法实践中效果并不好,这主要是因为目前学术研究和实践中都将焦点放在了效力问题上,按照大陆法的传统思维方式理解案例指导制度。只有转向效率维度,回归判例法思维,才可能带来理论和实践上的双重突破。
[Abstract]:Justice lies in the front line of dealing with the latest legal problems. Judges under the precedent system make up for the lag of the formulation law through the case law, and form new rules while solving the social disputes, and then promote the maximization of social efficiency. To a certain extent, the establishment of the case guidance system also shares the value pursuit of adapting to the needs of social change, The unified judicial application has the value of this efficiency pursuit. However, after the establishment of the case guidance system, the effect in judicial practice is not good, which is mainly due to the current academic research and practice have focused on the issue of effectiveness, according to the traditional thinking mode of continental law to understand the case guidance system. Only by turning to the dimension of efficiency and returning to the thinking of case law can we bring about a double breakthrough in theory and practice.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】