强制措施侦查监督权研究

发布时间：2018-05-22 17:26

本文选题：强制措施 + 侦查权　；参考：《天津商业大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：侦查过程的进行不仅肩负着惩罚犯罪的重任,还与保障人权有着密不可分的关系。尤其是侦查过程中强制措施的运用在实践中经常造成任意拘留和逮捕、超期羁押、变相羁押、刑讯逼供等情形。因此,世界各国都在加强对侦查活动的监督与控制。反观我国的强制措施侦查监督权制度,在理论研究和司法实践上,都没有形成系统化研究,亟需改革。因此,在注重犯罪嫌疑人人权保障的时代背景下,在“赵作海案”、“念斌案”等冤假错案的推动下,研究强制措施侦查监督权问题具有非常重大的理论价值和现实意义。论文立足于立法以及司法实践工作,深入剖析检察机关的侦查监督权行使的困境,并结合我国司法改革的实际,借鉴外国有益经验,对强制措施侦查监督权问题做了初步探索。论文具体分为五个部分:论文第一章是前言,主要介绍了课题研究的理论和实际应用价值、研究现状和研究趋势。论文第二章主要集中对基本概念进行辨析,围绕着强制措施、侦查权与侦查监督权从概念、内容以及逻辑关系上层层递进进行分析,致力于解决强制措施侦查监督的基本概念问题。同时阐述强制措施侦查监督权的理论基础,主要选取了四种主流理论,如分权制衡、权力有限、程序正义以及人权保障,从对理论的分析入手解决强制措施侦查监督权的合法以及合理性。论文第三章列举了四种具有代表性的强制措施侦查监督权模式,从侦查权和侦查监督权的权力配置入手分析侦查监督权分配的合理性,介绍了英美国家检警分立模式下的司法审查制度、大陆法系国家检警一体模式下预审法官制度、俄罗斯双重领导模式模式,并重点分析了我国的检察侦查监督权模式相关的立法规定、运行现状以及存在的问题,最后对强制措施侦查监督权在刑事诉讼制度全球化改革的时代背景下所呈现的发展趋势做出总结,指出司法控制已经成为普遍接受的权力模式。论文第四章紧承第三章,运用大量的数据,着重点在于分析我国检察机关的强制措施侦查监督权存在的问题以及产生这些问题的深层次原因,不仅是由于检察机关内生权力的繁杂庞大造成权力行使不明,还由于权力之间的相互冲突性使检察机关的权力到底为何陷入混沌。论文第五章立足前几章的理论与实践分析,试图重塑我国的强制措施侦查监督权,建议通过完善强制措施体系,并借助司法改革的契机,引入司法审查机制,建立相关配套设施,从源头上解决目前强制措施侦查监督的一系列问题。
[Abstract]:The investigation process not only shoulders the heavy responsibility of punishing crime, but also has a close relationship with the protection of human rights. In particular, the application of coercive measures in the process of investigation often results in arbitrary detention and arrest, extended detention, disguised detention, extortion of confessions by torture and so on. Therefore, countries all over the world are strengthening the supervision and control of investigative activities. On the contrary, there is no systematic research on the system of the power of investigation supervision in our country in theory and judicial practice, which needs to be reformed. Therefore, under the background of paying attention to the human rights protection of criminal suspects, under the promotion of "Zhao Zuohai case", "Nianbin case" and other unjust false and wrong cases, it is of great theoretical value and practical significance to study the issue of compulsory measure investigation supervision power. Based on the work of legislation and judicial practice, this paper deeply analyzes the dilemma of the procuratorial organ's exercise of the power of investigation and supervision, and combines the reality of judicial reform in our country, draws lessons from the beneficial experience of foreign countries, and makes a preliminary exploration on the issue of the power of compulsory measure of investigation and supervision. The paper is divided into five parts: the first chapter is the preface, mainly introduces the theoretical and practical application of the subject, research status and research trends. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of basic concepts, focusing on coercive measures, investigation power and investigation supervision power from the concept, content and logical relationship layer by layer analysis. It is committed to solve the basic concept problem of compulsory measure investigation and supervision. At the same time, it expounds the theoretical basis of the supervisory power of coercive measures investigation, mainly selects four main theories, such as separation of powers and checks and balances, limited power, procedural justice and human rights protection. From the theoretical analysis to solve the compulsory measures of investigation and supervision of the legitimate and reasonable. Chapter three enumerates four representative modes of investigative supervision power of coercive measures, and analyzes the rationality of the distribution of investigation supervision power from the power allocation of investigation power and investigation supervision power. This paper introduces the judicial review system in the mode of separation of procurators and police in Anglo-American countries, the pre-trial judge system in the mode of integration of prosecutors and police in civil law countries, and the dual leadership model of Russia. It also analyzes the relevant legislative provisions, operation status and existing problems of the mode of procuratorial investigation and supervision in China. Finally, the author summarizes the development trend of the compulsory measure investigation supervision power under the background of the reform of criminal procedure system globalization, and points out that judicial control has become a universally accepted power model. The fourth chapter of the paper closely follows the third chapter, using a large number of data, focusing on the analysis of our country's procuratorial organs compulsory measures of investigation and supervision of the existence of problems and the deep-seated causes of these problems. It is not only because the power of procuratorial organ is complicated and huge, but also because of the conflict between powers, why the power of procuratorial organ falls into chaos. The fifth chapter is based on the theoretical and practical analysis of the previous chapters, trying to reshape the supervisory power of compulsory measures investigation in our country, and proposes to introduce the judicial review mechanism through perfecting the system of coercive measures and taking advantage of the opportunity of judicial reform. Establish relevant supporting facilities to solve a series of problems in the investigation and supervision of compulsory measures at the source.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】