精英化与专业化的迷失——法官员额制的困境与出路

发布时间：2018-05-25 03:44

本文选题：司法改革 + 精英化　；参考：《政法论坛》2017年02期

【摘要】：我国近些年来司法改革所欲达到的目标是司法职业化或者精英化、专业化,法官员额制或者分类管理属于其中的核心内容。员额制本来是一种将审理权及裁判权归位的一项制度,在现实中却异化为各种利益的角力,其中关系到国家的利益、法院管理层的利益及法官个体的利益,甚至法官助理和书记员的利益也牵涉其中。因此,法官员额制或者分类管理目标的实现过程,其实也是各种利益的平衡过程。因此,对于法官员额制目标是否实现的问题,应当溯本求源,探求员额制背后的制度设计及相关支撑原理的契合度。针对员额制的问题,解决进路应当是综合性的,其中既包括法官员额制遴选的去行政化,也应当包括根据原则性与灵活性相结合的原则确定员额数(员额比)、遴选标准或方式等基础性内容。同时,还需要针对性地设计员额制的配套制度,从而使得法官员额制成为一种系统或者有效运行的整体,而不使之产生互相掣肘、割裂的碎片化现象。
[Abstract]:The aim of judicial reform in China in recent years is judicial professionalization or excellence, specialization, judge post system or classified management. The post system is originally a system that relegates the trial power and the adjudicative power, but in reality it is dissimilated into the struggle of various interests, which relates to the interests of the country, the interests of the management of the court and the interests of the individual judges. Even the interests of judges' assistants and clerks are involved. Therefore, the process of realizing the objective of judge post system or classified management is actually a process of balancing various interests. Therefore, whether the goal of the post system of judges can be realized should be traced back to the source, and the system design behind the post system and the consistency of the relevant supporting principles should be explored. With regard to the issue of the post system, the solution to the problem should be comprehensive, including the de-administration of the selection of judges. It should also include the basic elements of determining the number of posts based on the principle of principle and flexibility (ratio of posts, selection criteria or modalities). At the same time, it is necessary to design the supporting system of post system, so as to make the post system of judges become a system or an effective operation of the whole, and do not cause the phenomenon of mutual restraint and fragmentation.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】