司法潜规则:人民陪审员制度司法功能的运行障碍

发布时间：2018-05-25 04:39

本文选题：人民陪审员 + 司法民主　；参考：《法学》2013年09期

【摘要】：陪审制的政治功能只能依赖于其司法功能的有效运行才能发挥出来。司法潜规则有效地抑制了人民陪审员审判职能的发挥,使我国陪审制的形式意义大于实际作用,"陪而不审"成为一种常态。司法潜规则追求审判的准确性来表达司法的公正性,"着力点"集中于维护法官审判权;人民陪审员以公民参与审判的方式来体现司法的公正性,"着力点"是分割法官审判权。两种着力点呈现出两种不同层面的价值体系,在信任缺失的社会人文环境下,人民陪审员的象征价值成为了公众可以接受的司法状态。消解司法潜规则,改进人民陪审员参审机制,提高履职能力的有效方法,是重新设计陪审员选任方式,缩小陪审案件的范围,明确陪审案件中法官的责任标准,规制陪审员的合议细则,划分陪审员票权比重。
[Abstract]:The political function of jury system can only be brought into play by the effective operation of its judicial function. Judicial latent rules effectively restrain the function of people's jurors' trial, and make the formal meaning of jury system in our country more than the actual function, and "accompany but not try" becomes a kind of normal state. The judicial latent rules pursue the accuracy of trial to express the justice of the judicature, the "focus" is to protect the judge's judicial power, and the people's jurors embody the judicial fairness by the way of citizen's participation in the trial, and the "focus" is to divide the judge's jurisdiction. There are two different levels of value system in the two emphases. In the social and humanistic environment of lack of trust, the symbolic value of the people's jurors has become a judicial state acceptable to the public. The effective methods of dispelling judicial latent rules, improving the mechanism of people's assessors' participation and improving their ability to perform their duties are to redesign the selection and appointment of jurors, to narrow the scope of jury cases, and to clarify the standards of the judges' responsibilities in jury cases. Regulate the collegial rules of jurors and divide the proportion of jurors' voting rights.
【作者单位】：四川省社会科学院《社会科学研究》杂志社;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】