行政机关解决纠纷机制的制度衔接研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 12:25

本文选题：和谐社会 + 行政机关　；参考：《安徽大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前我国处于历史转型的特殊时期,社会主体的多元化将导致利益的多元化,社会由一元结构向多元结构转变,公民权利意识和民主意识逐渐增强。因此社会逐步凸显出问题：一是纠纷形式日益复杂多样与司法诉讼日益增多；二是传统解决纠纷方式日渐衰落,社会治理与解决纠纷的自然平衡出现不和谐,司法诉讼的困境与社会冲突同时积聚,预示社会治理方式有待改革创新和完善。同时,在各个国家和地区,基于对法治社会中社会治理经验教训的反思,各种非诉讼解决纠纷机制已经成为当代社会治理的新模式。很多国家和地区在法治社会的背景下,已经开始以以多元化解决纠纷机制为基点进行司法改革及法律文化体系重构；解决纠纷的理论研究则以关注事实与社会实践的视角和经验实证研究方法,对法学学科产生深刻的影响。因此,本文基于我国法治与社会治理发展现实及前景的考虑,在社会主义和谐社会的时代背景下,以“大调解”机制依托下的行政机关解决纠纷机制为重点,研究多元化解决纠纷机制的理论、对构建社会主义和谐社会的意义,以及建构行政机关解决纠纷机制的可行性与必要性,并提出了一些构建以“大调解”机制为依托的行政机关解决纠纷机制的具体制度衔接。具体包括以下三个部分：第一部分对当前社会主义和谐社会的时代背景及其当前社会治理中多元化解决纠纷机制对构建社会主义和谐社会的意义进行了分析,即行政机关解决纠纷机制的和谐社会语境。首先,在阐述和谐社会理论中,重点对其法律蕴意进行了解析；其次,从理论和社会实践需要两个层面分析了多元化解决纠纷机制对构建社会主义和谐社会的意义。第二部分通过理论和实践两个层面分析建构行政机关解决纠纷机制的可行性与必要性。首先,在理论证成和社会治理现实实践中,行政机关解决纠纷机制出现了一种价值判断的质疑和选择的困境。其次,在对现代行政法治的发展动态和“合意型”ADR的本质特点进行深入的思考后,我们可以得出行政机关解决纠纷机制多元化建构的可行性与必要性。第三部分在理顺现有行政机关解决纠纷机制制度及其关系的基础之上,强调目前以“大调解”机制为依托,构建一个相互协调、衔接的多元化行政机关解决纠纷机制。首先,对行政机关解决纠纷机制及其相互关系进行厘清,为制度创新、衔接作铺垫。其次,在充分介绍“大调解”机制理论与现实实践的前提下,对隐藏之下的行政机关解决纠纷机制制度衔接进行了具体设计,但同时也辐射到了周围的相关机制。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in a special period of historical transition, the diversification of social subjects will lead to the diversification of interests, the society will change from a unitary structure to a pluralistic structure, and the awareness of civil rights and democracy will be gradually strengthened. Therefore, the society gradually highlights the problems: first, the dispute forms are becoming more and more complex and judicial litigation is increasing; second, the traditional dispute resolution method is declining day by day, and the natural balance between social governance and dispute resolution is not in harmony. The dilemma of judicial proceedings and social conflicts accumulate at the same time, indicating that the mode of social governance needs to be reformed, innovated and improved. At the same time, in various countries and regions, based on the reflection of the experience and lessons of social governance in a society ruled by law, various non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms have become a new model of contemporary social governance. Many countries and regions under the background of the rule of law society have begun to take the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism as the basis for judicial reform and legal cultural system reconstruction; The theoretical study of dispute resolution has a profound impact on the subject of law from the perspective of facts and social practice and empirical research methods. Therefore, based on the consideration of the reality and prospect of the development of the rule of law and social governance in our country, under the background of the socialist harmonious society, this paper focuses on the dispute resolution mechanism of the administrative organs supported by the "Great Mediation" mechanism. The research on the theory of diversified dispute resolution mechanism is of significance to the construction of a harmonious socialist society, as well as the feasibility and necessity of constructing the dispute resolution mechanism of administrative organs. The paper also puts forward some specific system convergence of administrative agency dispute settlement mechanism based on "Great Mediation" mechanism. It includes the following three parts: the first part analyzes the background of the current socialist harmonious society and the significance of the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism in the current social governance to the construction of the socialist harmonious society. That is the harmonious social context of the dispute settlement mechanism of administrative organs. First of all, in the elaboration of the harmonious society theory, the emphasis is on the analysis of its legal implication; secondly, This paper analyzes the significance of the pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism to the construction of a harmonious socialist society from the two aspects of theory and social practice. The second part analyzes and constructs the dispute resolution mechanism of administrative organs through the theory and practice. The feasibility and necessity of First of all, in the practice of theoretical proof and social governance, the dispute resolution mechanism of administrative organs has a dilemma of questioning and choosing value judgment. Secondly, after deeply thinking about the development of the modern administrative rule of law and the essential characteristics of "consensual" ADR, We can draw the conclusion of the feasibility and necessity of the pluralistic construction of dispute resolution mechanism of administrative organs. The third part, on the basis of straightening out the existing dispute resolution mechanism system and its relationship, emphasizes that the mechanism of "Great Mediation" is currently relied on. To build a coordinated, cohesive and diversified administrative organs to resolve disputes mechanism. First of all, it clarifies the dispute settlement mechanism of administrative organs and their interrelations, paving the way for institutional innovation and convergence. Secondly, on the premise of fully introducing the theory and practice of "Great Mediation" mechanism, the paper designs the system of dispute resolution mechanism of administrative organs under the concealment, but at the same time, it also radiates to the relevant mechanism around it.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926;D922.1

【相似文献】