完善我国行政诉讼检察监督制度之探讨

发布时间：2018-06-11 12:18

本文选题：检察机关 + 行政诉讼　；参考：《南京工业大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政诉讼检察监督制度是我国一项非常重要的法律制度。但在行政诉讼中，由于被告的身份特殊，使诉讼参与者现实或潜在地感受到各种压力。再加上，当前我国存在着严重的地方保护主义，以及体制原因所造成的审判权对行政权的过分亲密，甚至依赖，实践中行政诉讼违法现象时有发生，严重地损害了司法权威，很多人甚至失去了对司法的信赖，人们普遍存在着不敢告、不愿告的心理，大量的行政违法得不到及时纠正和救济，所有这些必然地要求加强行政诉讼中的检察监督。由于前苏联的原因，中俄两国检察制度和理论方面有很多相同点，并且两国又都处于转型期，面临着较多相同或者相似的问题。因此，为了完善我国的行政诉讼检察监督制度我们不仅要借鉴大陆、英美法系国家的经验，更应当研究我们的近邻俄罗斯的经验与教训。本文探讨如何完善我国行政诉讼检察监督制度是从理论-实践-立法这几个方面去研究的。首先，是对行政诉讼检察监督概述做了介绍。当中介绍了我国行政诉讼检察监督制度的理论发展及其研究状况，对行政诉讼检察监督的性质、意义以及应当遵循的原则分别进行了论述。其次，是我国行政诉讼检察监督制度的缺陷及其原因分析。在该部分中，首先介绍了我国行政诉讼检察监督的立法现状和司法实践状况；通过对存在问题进行原因分析来论证我国行政诉讼检察监督制度发展的欠缺。再次是对国外行政诉讼检察监督制度的状况介绍。介绍了大陆、英美法系国家行政诉讼检察监督制度，着重介绍了俄罗斯行政诉讼检察监督制度的演变，并且阐述了对完善我国行政诉讼检察监督制度的启示。最后是完善我国行政诉讼检察监督制度的构想。这部分是本文的核心，，也是笔者着重论述的一个章节，根据前文对我国行政诉讼检察监督制度现状的分析，以及对比国外相关制度尤其是俄罗斯的相关制度研究，对我国现行制度缺陷作深入的分析，并对如何解决这些问题提出一些适合我国国情的对策，如在检察机关提起行政公益诉讼，支持起诉；落实行政抗诉，建立执行监督这几个方面来论述完善我国行政诉讼检察监督必要的步骤。本文从我国检察机关对行政诉讼监督制度的现状出发，找出存在的种种弊端，且对其作出原因分析，通过借鉴他国经验，立足本国国情，试图逐渐构建一个尽可能完善的行政诉讼检察监督体系。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation is a very important legal system in our country. However, in administrative proceedings, due to the special identity of the defendant, litigation participants feel various pressures in reality or potential. In addition, at present, there is serious local protectionism in our country, and the judicial power caused by institutional reasons is too close to or even dependent on the administrative power. In practice, the illegal phenomenon of administrative litigation occurs from time to time, which seriously damages the judicial authority. Many people even lost their trust in the administration of justice, people generally have the psychology of not suing, unwilling to sue, a large number of administrative violations can not be corrected and relief in time, all these inevitably require strengthening the procuratorial supervision in administrative proceedings. Because of the reason of the former Soviet Union, there are many similarities in the procuratorial system and theory between China and Russia, and both countries are in the transition period, and they are faced with many identical or similar problems. Therefore, in order to improve the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in our country, we should not only learn from the experience of mainland and Anglo-American law countries, We should study the experience and lessons of our close neighbor Russia. This paper discusses how to perfect the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in our country from the aspects of theory practice and legislation. First of all, an overview of the procuratorial supervision of administrative proceedings is introduced. It introduces the theoretical development and research status of the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China, and discusses the nature, significance and principles that should be followed in the procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation. Secondly, it analyzes the defects and causes of the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China. In this part, the author first introduces the legislative status and judicial practice of procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation in China, and proves the deficiency of the development of procuratorial supervision system in administrative litigation by analyzing the causes of the existing problems. Thirdly, it introduces the status of procuratorial supervision system in foreign administrative litigation. This paper introduces the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in mainland and Anglo-American law system, emphatically introduces the evolution of the procuratorial supervision system of Russian administrative litigation, and expounds the enlightenment of perfecting the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China. Finally, it is the conception of perfecting the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in our country. This part is the core of this article, and is also a chapter that the author focuses on. According to the analysis of the present situation of the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in our country, as well as the research on the relative systems in foreign countries, especially in Russia, This paper makes a deep analysis of the defects of our current system, and puts forward some countermeasures suitable for the national conditions of our country to solve these problems, such as bringing administrative public interest litigation in the procuratorial organs, supporting the prosecution, implementing the administrative protest, This paper discusses the necessary steps to perfect the procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation in our country. From the point of view of the present situation of the procuratorial organ of our country to the supervision system of administrative litigation, we find out all sorts of disadvantages, and analyze the reasons for it. By drawing lessons from the experience of other countries and based on their own national conditions, this paper tries to build a perfect procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation as far as possible.
【学位授予单位】：南京工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.3;D926.3

【参考文献】