检察院作为“法律监督机关”的历史解释与思考

发布时间：2018-06-19 15:05

本文选题：检察机关 + 检察权　；参考：《东岳论丛》2013年10期

【摘要】：关于检察院作为"法律监督机关"而行使"检察权"之宪法定位,需回到新中国宪法关于设置检察机关的原初意图与历史传统之中探究其发生之端绪,方可对检察院作为"法律监督机关"行使"检察权"之宪法规范作出妥当的历史解释,以此应对检察院性质与权能之争而面临的理论与现实的挑战。从我国制宪历史事实考察,所得出一个基本结论就是新中国宪法界定检察机关为法律监督机关之历史必然性,并形成了新中国宪法将检察院作为法律监督机关的历史传统。而由此而成的宪法文本关于"检察院是国家的法律监督机关"的规定,是对我国宪法监督体系之法律监督的专门授权规定,具有国家性、规范性、程序性与强制性,其侦查权与公诉权,其本质皆为法律监督权行使之方式。
[Abstract]:With regard to the constitutional orientation of the procuratorate's exercise of "procuratorial power" as a "legal supervisory organ", it is necessary to return to the original intention and historical tradition of setting up procuratorial organs in the Constitution of New China to explore the origin of the procuratorial organs. It is possible to make a proper historical explanation of the constitutional norms of procuratorate's exercise of "procuratorial power" as a "legal supervisory organ", so as to meet the theoretical and practical challenges faced by the procuratorate in the dispute over its nature and competence. A basic conclusion drawn from the historical facts of constitution-making in China is the historical inevitability of defining procuratorial organs as legal supervisory organs in the Constitution of New China, and forming the historical tradition that procuratorates are regarded as legal supervisory organs in the Constitution of New China. The provisions of the constitutional text on "the procuratorate is the legal supervisory organ of the state" are the special authorization provisions for the legal supervision of the constitutional supervision system of our country. They are of a state, normative, procedural and mandatory nature. The essence of investigation power and public prosecution power is the way of exercising legal supervision power.
【作者单位】：山东政法学院;
【基金】：山东省人民检察院2013年理论研究课题《基层民行检察工作机制研究》(项目编号:SD2013B13)中期研究成果
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】