媒体监督与司法审判的冲突与对话

发布时间：2018-06-19 22:42

本文选题：媒体监督 + 司法审判　；参考：《云南大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：近几年来,随着我国媒体对司法审判报道的逐渐增多,媒体监督与司法审判的冲突也引起了学术界乃至社会各界的广泛关注。媒体监督不仅是社会监督的重要组成部分,还是防治司法专横和司法腐败的有效手段。但从中国近几年媒体监督与司法审判关系的实践来看,可以发现一个明显的现象：媒体与司法的联系更紧密了,表现在媒体对司法审判更关注了；但更引人注目的是,媒体监督与司法审判的冲突也更为频繁了。如果说1998年的张金柱案件揭开了媒体监督与司法审判之间冲突的序幕,那么之后的刘涌案、蒋艳萍案则进一步深化了冲突。在媒体与大众的情绪得到宣泄之后,在所谓的“公平正义”实现之后,冷静下来的人们也开始理性地去思考：顺从民意的司法审判是民主化的法治还是司法审判过于软弱而导致了这样的悲哀?媒体在司法审判报道的过程中是否带有个人的主观情绪?面对诸多的冲突问题,我们迫切需要寻求媒体监督与司法审判二者的对话。学者们对此做出了呼吁,但从现有的探讨来看,不管是在理念上还是在制度上仍存在分歧。本论文在对这些观点进行深入分析和思考之后,提出了这样的观点：通过引导媒体作正确的司法报道和监督,来帮助司法审判实现独立,促成媒体监督与司法审判的对话与合作。也就是说,媒体监督司法审判的重点应该是干扰司法审判的各种外部因素,应为司法营造一个安静而中立的审判环境；同时,媒体也应该积极引导社会大众树立法律信仰和尊重司法的观念。我们应该知道,司法公正实现的根基在于司法审判的独立,而不是依靠媒体的监督来实现的。媒体的宗旨在于向社会各界传递信息,而不在于是否能代表公平正义。媒体应该遵守其合理的监督范围,而不能越俎代庖。正是基于上述存在的问题,本文试图通过对媒体监督与司法审判的冲突进行初步的探索。导论部分明确了选题的意义,对近几年有关媒体监督与司法审判关系的国内外文献综述进行全面的介绍。文章的主体分为四个部分。第一部分简单地对媒体监督、司法审判等一些基本词语进行了说明。第二部分对我国现阶段媒体监督与司法审判存在的冲突问题进行阐述并分析了二者发生冲突的原因。第三部分分析了目前我国司法审判存在的问题,以及媒体监督与司法审判由冲突走向对话的必要性。第四部分是文章比较重要的部分,主要是针对媒体监督与司法审判由冲突走向对话提出的一些建议和措施。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing of media reports on judicial trial, the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial has aroused widespread concern in academic and even social circles. Media supervision is not only an important part of social supervision, but also an effective means to prevent judicial arbitrariness and judicial corruption. However, judging from the practice of the relationship between media supervision and judicial trial in China in recent years, we can find an obvious phenomenon: the relationship between the media and the judiciary has become closer, as shown by the media paying more attention to the judicial trial; but what is more striking is that, The conflict between media supervision and judicial trial is also more frequent. If the 1998 case of Zhang Jinzhu opened the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial, then the Liu Yong case and Jiang Yanping case further deepened the conflict. After the feelings of the media and the public have been released, and after the so-called "fair and just" has been realized, People who calm down also start to think rationally: is a democratic rule of law or too weak a judicial trial that obeys the will of the people? Does the media have personal subjective emotions in the process of judicial reporting? In the face of many conflicts, we urgently need to seek the dialogue between media supervision and judicial trial. Scholars have called for this, but from the current discussion, there are still differences in ideas and systems. After deeply analyzing and pondering on these viewpoints, this paper puts forward the following viewpoints: to help the judicial trial achieve independence by guiding the media to make correct judicial reports and supervision. To promote dialogue and cooperation between media supervision and judicial trial. That is to say, the focus of media supervision on judicial trial should be to interfere with various external factors of judicial trial and to create a quiet and neutral trial environment for the judiciary; at the same time, The media should also actively guide the public to establish legal beliefs and respect for the concept of justice. We should know that judicial justice is based on the independence of justice, not on the supervision of the media. The aim of the media is to convey information to all sectors of society, not to represent fairness and justice. The media should abide by its reasonable scope of supervision, rather than encroaching on its behalf. Based on the above problems, this paper attempts to explore the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial. The introduction part clarifies the significance of the topic, and gives a comprehensive introduction to the literature review on the relationship between media supervision and judicial trial in recent years. The main body of the article is divided into four parts. The first part simply explains some basic words such as media supervision, judicial trial and so on. The second part expounds the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial and analyzes the causes of the conflict. The third part analyzes the existing problems of judicial trial in our country and the necessity of media supervision and judicial trial from conflict to dialogue. The fourth part is the more important part of the article, mainly for the media supervision and judicial trial from conflict to dialogue put forward some suggestions and measures.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】