判例制度功能的考察与借鉴

发布时间：2018-06-20 07:17

本文选题：判例 + 判例制度　；参考：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：自1902年沈家本、伍廷芳主持变法修律以来,中国法律现代化已迄百年。选择继受大陆法系的成文法传统固然有其原因,但也不无历史的偶然。而近一百年来两大法系之间的互相融合,也变得越来越明显。出于对原有路径的依赖,全盘抛弃大陆法系的成文法模式而改为英美法系的判例法传统已经不可能,但是如何在成文法模式下,而对判例法的合理部分加以吸收,仍是一个值得思考的问题。本文的第一部分系统回顾了英美法系特别是英国法中,判例制度的起源和随后的发展,同时对判例制度的具体运作进行了考察,对遵循先例的内容以及后来对其所做的修正做了相关的介绍。文章的第二部分考察了在大陆法系国家,判例制度发展的历史和当今适用的现状,并比较了两大法系中判例的不同,而这种不同的哲学基础则是理性主义和经验主义的对立。文章的第三部分分别考察了中国古代所存在的判例和清末民初开始变法以来,判例制度的进一步发展。随后,文章讨论了1949年特别是1978年以来,在法制建设中,判例适用的现状,在文章的结尾,在比较了判例制度的优缺点之后,对借鉴判例制度的必要性和可行性进行了初步论证,同时,对我国案例指导制度的发展提出了自己的构想,认为,司法解释应该从现在的抽象性逐渐向判例化转变,为此,就判例是否应具有拘束力提出了自己的意见,认为应该赋予判例以拘束力,同时,从案例汇编的选编开始做起,以期逐渐建立我国的判例解释制度。
[Abstract]:Since Shen Jiaben and Wu Tingfang presided over the law reform in 1902, the modernization of Chinese law has been a hundred years. There are some reasons for choosing the statutory tradition of civil law system, but it is not without historical fortuitousness. In the last hundred years, the fusion between the two legal systems has become more and more obvious. Out of the dependence on the original path, it is impossible to completely abandon the statutory law model of the continental law system and change it into the case law tradition of the common law system, but how to absorb the reasonable part of the case law under the statutory law mode, It is still a question worth thinking about. The first part of this paper systematically reviews the origin and subsequent development of the case law system in the common law system, especially in the English law system, at the same time, it investigates the concrete operation of the case law system. The contents of following precedents and the amendments made to them are introduced. The second part of the article examines the history of the development of the case law system and the current situation of its application in the countries of continental law system, and compares the differences between the two legal systems, which are based on the antagonism between rationalism and empiricism. The third part of the article examines the case law existing in ancient China and the further development of the precedent system since the beginning of reform in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China. Then, the article discusses the current situation of the application of jurisprudence in the construction of legal system since 1949, especially since 1978. At the end of the article, after comparing the merits and demerits of the precedent system, The necessity and feasibility of drawing lessons from the precedent system are preliminarily demonstrated. At the same time, the author puts forward his own conception for the development of the case guidance system in China, and holds that the judicial interpretation should gradually change from the abstract to the precedent. The author puts forward his own opinion on whether the case law should have binding force, and holds that it should be given binding force to the case law. At the same time, it begins with the selection and compilation of the case compilation, in order to gradually establish the interpretation system of our country's case law.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926;D929

【引证文献】