民事执行听证制度若干问题探析

发布时间：2018-06-20 08:38

本文选题：民事执行 + 听证制度　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事执行听证制度是为确保执行程序公正而推出的一项重大举措，从开始在一些法院试点操作，至今已经历时数载，，取得了初步的预期效果。但是由于至今没有形成一部全国统一的民事执行听证程序规则，很多法院的执行听证程序在实际操作中出现很多问题，具体法律规定有待进一步完善。笔者认为，想要更好地了解一种制度，需要从多方面入手，但首要问题是对该制度的概念进行界定。本文探析的第一个问题，也就是民事执行听证的概念界定问题。在对理论界和实务界不同观点分析的基础上，笔者提出自己的定义，并通过进一步分析执行听证的分类和定位问题，来更好地验证自己对这一概念界定的正确性。接下来分析的是执行听证的法律特性和该制度设立的目的，这样更容易对这一制度有更明晰的认识。本文第二部分谈到的是执行听证的法理探析，在更深层面上论述执行听证存在的依据及其与强制执行权的适应性。第三部分谈到了我国实施执行听证的必要性和可行性，进一步论述执行程序中执行听证存在的合理性。第四部分是执行听证运行中存在问题的探析，指出现行实践中执行听证遭遇到的一些不足之处。第五部分在论述执行听证基本原则的前提下，提出了对该制度进行相应的设计，主要也是为了完善民事执行听证制度做探讨。在文章的最后，笔者谈到了执行听证主体确定的问题和听证中和解的问题，这些问题也是目前理论界探讨的热点。由于笔者理论水平所限，本文理论性方面定会存在瑕疵。但依然希望这些肤浅之见，能对规范我国民事执行工作、设立具体民事听证制度起到一些促进作用。
[Abstract]:The civil execution hearing system is an important measure to ensure the fairness of the execution procedure. From the beginning of the trial operation in some courts, it has lasted several years and obtained the preliminary expected effect. However, due to the lack of a unified civil execution hearing procedure rules, many courts have many problems in the actual operation, the specific legal provisions need to be further improved. The author thinks that if we want to understand a system better, we should start from many aspects, but the first problem is to define the concept of the system. The first problem of this paper is the definition of civil execution hearing. Based on the analysis of different viewpoints of the theoretical and practical circles, the author puts forward his own definition, and further analyzes the classification and orientation of the executive hearing to better verify the correctness of his definition of the concept. Then it analyzes the legal characteristics of the executive hearing and the purpose of the establishment of the system, which makes it easier to have a clearer understanding of the system. The second part of this paper discusses the legal theory of the executive hearing, and discusses the basis of the existence of the executive hearing and its adaptability to the enforcement right in a deeper level. The third part discusses the necessity and feasibility of the execution hearing in our country, and further discusses the rationality of the execution hearing in the execution procedure. The fourth part is the analysis of the problems existing in the operation of the executive hearing, pointing out some deficiencies encountered in the current practice. The fifth part, on the premise of discussing the basic principles of executive hearing, puts forward the corresponding design of the system, mainly for the purpose of perfecting the civil execution hearing system. At the end of the article, the author talks about the problems of the subject of the executive hearing and the settlement in the hearing, which is also a hot topic in the field of theory at present. Due to the limitations of the author's theoretical level, the theoretical aspects of this paper will be flawed. But I still hope that these superficial views can promote the standardization of civil execution and the establishment of specific civil hearing system.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.1;D926

【参考文献】