推广社会调查报告的障碍及对策

发布时间：2018-06-21 10:20

本文选题：少年司法 + 社会调查报告　；参考：《中国刑事法杂志》2012年02期

【摘要】：社会调查报告是少年司法的创新,但在普通司法改革中却一直难以推广。成年人司法在背景上不同于少年司法,即没有普遍的有罪答辩形成的独立量刑程序和基于被告人未成年人身份彰显的轻缓量刑偏好。调查报告的实践表明,报告制作主体不明确、不统一,各种制度设计也都存在不足之处;报告内容缺乏灵活性且对恶意报告的监督不完备;缺乏说理和论证的报告结论无法取信于法官;报告作用是否只限于量刑问题也有意见分歧。为了在普通刑事司法改革中引入调查报告,其正当性根据应是其促使量刑信息充分、量刑结果科学、刑罚执行合理和法官裁量控制的功能,而且应当明确以辩护为核心的报告宗旨,完善报告的具体制作并且建构独立的量刑程序。
[Abstract]:Social investigation report is the innovation of juvenile justice, but it is difficult to popularize in ordinary judicial reform. Adult justice is different from juvenile justice in background, that is, there is no independent sentencing procedure formed by universal guilty pleading and mild sentencing preference based on the status of the accused minor. The practice of investigation report shows that the main body of report making is not clear and uniform, and all kinds of system design are also deficient, the content of report is not flexible and the supervision of malicious report is not complete. The conclusions of the report without reasoning and argumentation cannot be trusted by the judge; whether the role of the report is limited to the issue of sentencing is also divided. In order to introduce the investigation report into the ordinary criminal justice reform, its legitimate basis should be its function of promoting sufficient sentencing information, scientific sentencing results, reasonable penalty execution and judge discretion control. Moreover, we should make clear the purpose of reporting with defense as the core, perfect the concrete production of the report and construct independent sentencing procedure.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.2

【参考文献】