司法权威的文化建构机理

发布时间：2018-06-23 01:53

本文选题：司法 + 权威　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2013年06期

【摘要】：作为一种文化现象,司法权威取决于人们对司法主体的文化定位、司法过程的文化认同和司法结果的文化支持。司法主体权威的内涵、能量和界限取决于司法角色的文化定位、司法功能的文化期待和司法管辖范围的文化选择;司法活动是寻找事实和寻求法律的文化认识、文化评价和文化选择的过程,其权威根源于文化认同,来自于文化共识,立基于文化解释。司法裁判的权威深受人们诉讼观念的影响,尊重司法结果的文化意识是司法权威确立的前提,认同司法结果的文化取向是司法权威的基础,支持司法最终解决的文化理念是司法权威的支撑。只有给法官能够独立思考和判断的空间,只要对司法机关作出的事实判断、法律解释、司法立法给予足够的尊重、理解和支持,法官才能摆脱外在的各种压力,真正走向自治和自强,从而不断地提升司法的权威性。
[Abstract]:As a cultural phenomenon, judicial authority depends on the cultural orientation of the judicial subject, the cultural identity of the judicial process and the cultural support of the judicial outcome. The connotation, energy and limit of judicial subject authority depend on the cultural orientation of judicial role, the cultural expectation of judicial function and the cultural choice of judicial jurisdiction. The process of cultural evaluation and cultural choice, whose authority originates from cultural identity, comes from cultural consensus and is based on cultural interpretation. The authority of judicial decision is deeply influenced by people's concept of litigation. The cultural consciousness of respecting judicial result is the premise of the establishment of judicial authority, and the cultural orientation of recognizing judicial result is the foundation of judicial authority. The cultural idea of supporting the final solution of justice is the support of judicial authority. Only by giving judges the space to think and judge independently, as long as they give sufficient respect, understanding and support to the fact judgments, legal interpretations, and judicial legislation made by the judicial organs, can the judges get rid of all kinds of external pressures. True to self-governance and self-improvement, so as to continuously enhance the authority of the judiciary.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(12FXA002)“司法权威生成的文化机制研究”
【分类号】：D916

【参考文献】