我国民事疑难案件裁判规范的生成研究

发布时间：2018-07-08 13:24

本文选题：裁判规范 + 法律解释　；参考：《广东商学院》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：裁判规范是在司法裁判过程中，法官通过结合具体案情和法律规范所形成的目的在于解决诉讼争议而生成的个案规范。裁判规范是法官裁判案件解决纠纷的直接依据。法律规范与裁判规范不同，法律规范是裁判规范生成的基础。在我国民事疑难案件中，可能存在法律规定模糊、法律存在漏洞或者法律相互冲突的情形。法官在面对这些情形时，需要运用法律解释的方法、填补法律漏洞的方法等法律方法生成裁判规范。法官在运用法律方法生成裁判规范的过程可能会受到法官自身因素和利益因素的影响，，甚至在此过程中，因为法官法律感的缺失、裁判过程的硬化导致裁判规范生成的不正当或者不合理。为了保证裁判规范生成的正当性和合理性，本文认为首先要完善和提高法官的权限和素质，其次对法官所生成的裁判规范进行必要的论证并完善我国案例指导制度，使裁判规范的生成在法律方法的运用上相对一致，避免生成的裁判规范差异较大，造成同案不同判的现象。
[Abstract]:In the process of judicial adjudication, the criterion of adjudication is a case norm which is formed by combining the specific case and the legal norm, the purpose of which is to resolve the dispute of litigation. The adjudication standard is the direct basis for the judge to resolve the dispute. Legal norms are different from adjudicative norms, and legal norms are the basis for the formation of adjudicative norms. In difficult civil cases in China, there may be vague legal provisions, loopholes or conflicting laws. In the face of these situations, judges need to use the legal interpretation method, the method of filling the legal loophole and other legal methods to produce the adjudication norm. The judge may be influenced by the judge's own factors and interests in the process of using the legal method to produce the adjudication norm, even in this process, because of the lack of the judge's sense of law. The hardening of the referee process leads to improper or unreasonable rules of adjudication. In order to ensure the legitimacy and rationality of the formation of the adjudicative norms, this paper holds that first of all, it is necessary to perfect and improve the jurisdiction and quality of the judges, and then to conduct the necessary argumentation on the judges' generated adjudicative norms and to perfect the guiding system of our country's cases. To make the formation of adjudicative norms relatively consistent in the application of legal methods, to avoid the formation of greater differences in the norms of adjudication, resulting in the phenomenon of different judgments in the same case.
【学位授予单位】：广东商学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】