探索审判制度改革应遵循的基本边界——以小额速裁试点推动修法为例

发布时间：2018-07-09 22:32

本文选题：小额速裁 + 立法权　；参考：《法学》2013年08期

【摘要】：司法根据现实需要,对相关的民事审判制度作出一定的调整,但此种调整需遵循一定的边界。最高人民法院在2012年《民事诉讼法》修改之前通过发布《关于部分基层人民法院开展小额速裁试点工作的指导意见》,安排部署在全国90个基层人民法院开展小额速裁试点工作的做法,超出了之前我国两审终审基本审判制度的范围,构成对最高国家权力机关立法权的僭越。民事诉讼法的基本原则和基本审判制度,构成了我国诉讼法的基本内容,对这些内容的调整属于立法权的范围,应遵循法律保留的基本要求;如需在修法之前通过试点总结经验,可以通过由全国人大常委会授权的形式进行,从而使得试点工作具有法律上的正当性。从我国的宪法架构和法律传统(成文法传统)而言,我国属于立法权优位的法律解释模式,这决定了在我国法律制度的解释过程中,立法机关是居于主导地位,审判权处于辅助或者补充地位,审判机关的解释受到严格限制。
[Abstract]:According to the practical needs, the judicature adjusts the relevant civil trial system, but this kind of adjustment must follow certain boundary. Prior to the revision of the Civil procedure Law in 2012, the Supreme people's Court arranged for the deployment of small amounts in 90 grass-roots people's courts throughout the country through the issuance of the guiding opinions on the pilot work of some grass-roots people's courts in small amounts. The practice of expediting pilot work, It is beyond the scope of our country's basic trial system of final appeal and constitutes a violation of the legislative power of the supreme state power. The basic principles and the basic trial system of the civil procedure law constitute the basic content of our country's procedural law. The adjustment of these contents belongs to the scope of the legislative power and should follow the basic requirements of the law reservation. If it is necessary to sum up experience through pilot projects before the revision of the law, it can be carried out in the form authorized by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress, thus making the pilot work legally legitimate. In terms of our constitutional framework and legal tradition (statutory tradition), our country belongs to the mode of legal interpretation of legislative power, which determines that in the process of interpretation of our legal system, the legislature is in the leading position. The judicial power is in the auxiliary or supplementary position, and the interpretation of the judicial organ is strictly restricted.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】