论审判团队制度之完善
发布时间：2018-07-18 11:11
【摘要】：审判团队在弱化案件审批、强化专业审理、推动领导办案、优化人力配置等方面已取得成效,尤其在"去行政化"促进法官独立审判,重"集约化"强化团队办案力量上体现出显著的制度优势。同时,该项改革也存在制度和实践两个层面的问题,包括司法责任制难以完全落实、增加管理成本、削弱审判合力优势、审判庭长"有权无力"导致履职困难等。对此,我们建议,一方面应强化制度自洽,重视既有制度对接和给未来制度留下接口,另一方面应加强改革的协同落实,通过顶层设计统筹安排、启动释法或修法,对审判团队制度做出更为系统、整体和可行的完善设计。
[Abstract]:Judicial teams have achieved results in weakening the examination and approval of cases, strengthening professional adjudication, promoting leadership in handling cases, optimizing manpower allocation, and so on, especially in "de-administrating" judges to promote independent trials. Emphasis on "intensification" to strengthen the strength of the team case handling reflects a significant institutional advantage. At the same time, there are two problems in the reform, such as the difficulty of carrying out the judicial responsibility system completely, the increase of management cost, the weakening of the advantage of trial resultant force, and the difficulty of carrying out duties caused by the judge's "powerlessness" and so on. In this regard, we suggest that, on the one hand, we should strengthen institutional self-consistency, attach importance to the docking of existing systems and leave interfaces to future systems, on the other hand, we should strengthen the coordinated implementation of reforms, and initiate interpretation or revision through top-level design arrangements. The trial team system to make a more systematic, overall and feasible perfect design.
【作者单位】： 上海市杨浦区人民法院;上海市第二中级人民法院;贵州省高级人民法院审委会办公室;上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【基金】：贵州省人大常委会专项委托课题“贵州地方法院改革及其成效与规律研究”的成果之一
【分类号】：D926.2
本文编号：2131723
[Abstract]:Judicial teams have achieved results in weakening the examination and approval of cases, strengthening professional adjudication, promoting leadership in handling cases, optimizing manpower allocation, and so on, especially in "de-administrating" judges to promote independent trials. Emphasis on "intensification" to strengthen the strength of the team case handling reflects a significant institutional advantage. At the same time, there are two problems in the reform, such as the difficulty of carrying out the judicial responsibility system completely, the increase of management cost, the weakening of the advantage of trial resultant force, and the difficulty of carrying out duties caused by the judge's "powerlessness" and so on. In this regard, we suggest that, on the one hand, we should strengthen institutional self-consistency, attach importance to the docking of existing systems and leave interfaces to future systems, on the other hand, we should strengthen the coordinated implementation of reforms, and initiate interpretation or revision through top-level design arrangements. The trial team system to make a more systematic, overall and feasible perfect design.
【作者单位】： 上海市杨浦区人民法院;上海市第二中级人民法院;贵州省高级人民法院审委会办公室;上海交通大学凯原法学院;
【基金】：贵州省人大常委会专项委托课题“贵州地方法院改革及其成效与规律研究”的成果之一
【分类号】：D926.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 石浩旭;;司法救助制度探析[J];天水行政学院学报;2008年06期
2 宋晓辉;;我国举报人权利保护问题浅析[J];商品与质量;2012年S1期
，本文编号：2131723
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2131723.html
