试论刑事和解的检察监督
发布时间：2018-07-26 12:44
【摘要】：近年来,随着修复社会关系的需要,以及对被害人保护意识的增强,司法机关越来越多地运用刑事和解处理轻微刑事案件,化解社会矛盾。2012年3月,修改后的《刑事诉讼法》将刑事和解纳入法律规定。但是由于缺乏法律监督,刑事和解案件中当事人意志自由受到侵害、加害人以钱赎刑、社会公共利益受到侵犯等问题在一些地方开始显现,不利于法律的公正和严肃。检察机关作为法律监督机关,对刑事和解实施法律监督,具有法律上的正当性和事实上的可行性。刑事和解的检察监督,应重点监督在刑事和解过程中,有无违反自愿原则、公平正义原则和有限和解原则的情形发生。检察监督应当采取书面审查和事实审查相结合的方法,保障刑事和解的正当性和合法性。同时,国家应当通过立法,制定和完善刑事被害人救助机制,防止刑事和解制度的滥用,确保司法公正。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the need to repair social relations and the increasing awareness of victim protection, the judiciary has increasingly used criminal reconciliation to handle minor criminal cases and resolve social contradictions. The revised Criminal procedure Law incorporated criminal reconciliation into the law. However, due to the lack of legal supervision, the free will of the parties in the criminal reconciliation cases is infringed, the perpetrators redeem the punishment with money, and the social public interests are infringed in some places, which is not conducive to the justice and seriousness of the law. As the legal supervision organ, the procuratorial organ carries out the legal supervision to the criminal reconciliation, has the legal legitimacy and the fact feasibility. The procuratorial supervision of criminal reconciliation should focus on whether there are violations of the voluntary principle, the principle of fairness and justice and the principle of limited reconciliation in the process of criminal reconciliation. Procuratorial supervision should adopt the method of combining written and factual examination to ensure the legitimacy and legality of criminal reconciliation. At the same time, the state should adopt legislation to establish and perfect the mechanism of criminal victim assistance, to prevent the abuse of criminal reconciliation system and to ensure judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3
本文编号：2146051
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the need to repair social relations and the increasing awareness of victim protection, the judiciary has increasingly used criminal reconciliation to handle minor criminal cases and resolve social contradictions. The revised Criminal procedure Law incorporated criminal reconciliation into the law. However, due to the lack of legal supervision, the free will of the parties in the criminal reconciliation cases is infringed, the perpetrators redeem the punishment with money, and the social public interests are infringed in some places, which is not conducive to the justice and seriousness of the law. As the legal supervision organ, the procuratorial organ carries out the legal supervision to the criminal reconciliation, has the legal legitimacy and the fact feasibility. The procuratorial supervision of criminal reconciliation should focus on whether there are violations of the voluntary principle, the principle of fairness and justice and the principle of limited reconciliation in the process of criminal reconciliation. Procuratorial supervision should adopt the method of combining written and factual examination to ensure the legitimacy and legality of criminal reconciliation. At the same time, the state should adopt legislation to establish and perfect the mechanism of criminal victim assistance, to prevent the abuse of criminal reconciliation system and to ensure judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 苏州市平江区人民检察院课题组;崔进文;叶芊;;刑事和解法律监督问题研究[J];法学杂志;2008年05期
2 刘伟;;背景与困境:刑事和解制度的理性考察[J];河北法学;2007年05期
3 王学成;张和林;;刑事和解的困境与出路[J];华东政法大学学报;2007年05期
4 华玲;;刑事和解法律监督的程序设计[J];中国检察官;2008年06期
，本文编号：2146051
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2146051.html
