高级人民法院“司法解释性文件”的功能分析
发布时间：2018-08-10 22:14
【摘要】：近年来,地方法院制定司法解释性文件的现象较为普遍。这其中,高级法院的司法解释性文件是通过满足上级法院与下级法院的需求,从而发挥着一种"承上启下"的功能。对上,高级法院制定司法解释性文件的活动,一定程度上缓解了最高法院司法解释的供给压力;对下,高级法院的司法解释性文件又不同程度地满足了下级法院法律适用的需求,继而使得下级法院与高级法院在法律适用方面的一体化程度增强。2015年修订后的《立法法》仍延续着既往司法解释制度一味强调"堵"住地方法院司法解释资源供给的思路,但现实生活中由于正式的司法解释资源不能满足法律适用的需求,仍旧大量出现地方法院的司法解释性文件,导致了对现行司法解释制度目标——法律适用统一性的"内卷化"效应。解决这一矛盾的出路,需要反思现行司法解释制度,实现对高级法院司法解释的权力配置由"堵"到"疏"的方向转变。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the phenomenon of local courts making judicial explanatory documents is more common. Among them, the judicial explanatory document of the High Court is to meet the needs of the higher court and the lower court, so as to play a "connecting link" function. To a certain extent, the activities of the High Court to formulate judicial explanatory documents have alleviated the pressure on the Supreme Court to provide judicial interpretation. The judicial explanatory documents of the High Court meet, to varying degrees, the needs of the lower courts for the application of the law. Then the lower courts and the higher courts become more integrated in the application of the law. The Legislative Law, as amended in 2015, still continues the idea that the past judicial interpretation system has always emphasized "blocking" the supply of judicial interpretation resources in the local courts. However, due to the fact that the formal judicial interpretation resources can not meet the needs of the application of the law, there are still a large number of judicial explanatory documents of the local courts. It leads to the effect of the unification of the application of law to the target of the current judicial interpretation system. In order to solve this contradiction, we should reflect on the current judicial interpretation system and realize the transformation of the power allocation of the judicial interpretation of the higher court from "blocking" to "sparse".
【作者单位】： 对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2
本文编号：2176365
[Abstract]:In recent years, the phenomenon of local courts making judicial explanatory documents is more common. Among them, the judicial explanatory document of the High Court is to meet the needs of the higher court and the lower court, so as to play a "connecting link" function. To a certain extent, the activities of the High Court to formulate judicial explanatory documents have alleviated the pressure on the Supreme Court to provide judicial interpretation. The judicial explanatory documents of the High Court meet, to varying degrees, the needs of the lower courts for the application of the law. Then the lower courts and the higher courts become more integrated in the application of the law. The Legislative Law, as amended in 2015, still continues the idea that the past judicial interpretation system has always emphasized "blocking" the supply of judicial interpretation resources in the local courts. However, due to the fact that the formal judicial interpretation resources can not meet the needs of the application of the law, there are still a large number of judicial explanatory documents of the local courts. It leads to the effect of the unification of the application of law to the target of the current judicial interpretation system. In order to solve this contradiction, we should reflect on the current judicial interpretation system and realize the transformation of the power allocation of the judicial interpretation of the higher court from "blocking" to "sparse".
【作者单位】： 对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 ;关于地方各级人民法院不应制定司法解释性文件的批复[J];中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报;1987年02期
，本文编号：2176365
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2176365.html
