法经济学视角下的检察机关执法公信力建设

发布时间：2018-08-11 10:18

【摘要】：执法机关公信力建设对展现司法权威、增强社会正义、促进和谐发展具有重要意义。但长期以来公信力建设过于强调提高执法人员素质,在宣传工作中较少考虑法律本体价值与社会大众普遍价值诉求的关系,形成了一种单边建设的"渠道"模式。修正后的《刑事诉讼法》中某些具体措施并未清晰定义其法律实体价值。在公众舆论的迫切需求中正确认识自己,是检察机关建设其执法公信力的重点。当前公众舆论对司法程序的理论与实践焦点在于:司法程序是否应成为公共物品;涉嫌职务犯罪案件是否应更多的适用强制措施。由此可知,检察机关不需要靠提供公共物品获得公信力评价,其重新定位的司法拘束力、判断力与排除力与社会大众价值具有内在一致性;检察机关应向社会大众展现法律的实体价值,以其司法中立性的模范作用引导社会各阶层,促进社会各阶层间相互的价值认同与包容力,建设执法机关公信力与社会信任。
[Abstract]:The construction of law enforcement credibility is of great significance to show judicial authority, strengthen social justice and promote harmonious development. However, for a long time, the construction of public trust has put too much emphasis on improving the quality of law enforcement personnel, and less consideration has been given to the relationship between the value of legal Noumenon and the demands of the general value of the public in propaganda work, which has formed a "channel" mode of unilateral construction. Some specific measures in the amended Code of Criminal procedure do not clearly define the value of its legal entity. It is important for procuratorial organs to correctly understand themselves in the urgent need of public opinion. At present, the focus of public opinion on the judicial procedure lies in whether the judicial procedure should become a public good and whether more compulsory measures should be applied in the case of suspected job-related crime. It can be seen that the procuratorial organ does not need to provide public goods to obtain credibility evaluation, its repositioning of judicial restraint, judgment and exclusion with the social value of the public has internal consistency; The procuratorial organ should show the value of the law to the public, guide the social strata with its exemplary role of judicial neutrality, promote the mutual value identification and tolerance among the social strata, and build the credibility of the law enforcement agencies and social trust.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.3;D925.2

【相似文献】