案例指导制度的特色、难题与前景
发布时间：2018-09-01 18:01
【摘要】：与两大法系判例制度比较,案例指导制度有鲜明的国情和时代特色,其中最核心的特点是承载司法管理职能和以行政化方式运行。这使案例指导制度内含着难以化解的逻辑难题:统一司法与司法创新、司法多样性及适用案例要旨的冲突;立法权威与指导性案例实践效力的冲突;司法行政化的弱化与强化之困;实施控制措施内部化的硬性与脆性共存;指导性案例与司法解释混同之虞;指导性案例质量与效益不确定等,这些难题加大了推进案例指导的难度,妨碍案例指导制度的落实。减弱现行案例指导的刚性,建立更好地平衡约束和尊重司法自由裁量权为核心的、符合案例作用规律的、更柔性的案例作用机制,有利于案例指导制度走的更好。
[Abstract]:Compared with the case law system of the two major legal systems, the case guidance system has distinct national conditions and characteristics of the times, the core of which is to carry the function of judicial management and to run in an administrative way. This makes the system of case guidance contain insoluble logical problems: unified judicature and judicial innovation, judicial diversity and conflict of applicable case tenets, conflicts between legislative authority and practical effectiveness of guiding cases; The weakening and strengthening of judicial administration, the coexistence of rigidity and brittleness in the internalization of control measures, the confusion between instructive cases and judicial interpretation, the uncertainty of the quality and benefit of instructive cases, etc. These problems increase the difficulty of case guidance and hinder the implementation of case guidance system. Weakening the rigidity of the current case guidance and establishing a better balance between restraint and respect for judicial discretion as the core, in line with the law of case action, more flexible case action mechanism, is conducive to better case guidance system.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“检察官客观义务本土化问题研究”(10YJC820088) 南京大学985三期项目资助
【分类号】：D926
[Abstract]:Compared with the case law system of the two major legal systems, the case guidance system has distinct national conditions and characteristics of the times, the core of which is to carry the function of judicial management and to run in an administrative way. This makes the system of case guidance contain insoluble logical problems: unified judicature and judicial innovation, judicial diversity and conflict of applicable case tenets, conflicts between legislative authority and practical effectiveness of guiding cases; The weakening and strengthening of judicial administration, the coexistence of rigidity and brittleness in the internalization of control measures, the confusion between instructive cases and judicial interpretation, the uncertainty of the quality and benefit of instructive cases, etc. These problems increase the difficulty of case guidance and hinder the implementation of case guidance system. Weakening the rigidity of the current case guidance and establishing a better balance between restraint and respect for judicial discretion as the core, in line with the law of case action, more flexible case action mechanism, is conducive to better case guidance system.
【作者单位】： 南京大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“检察官客观义务本土化问题研究”(10YJC820088) 南京大学985三期项目资助
【分类号】：D926
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张，
本文编号：2217939
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2217939.html
